Symplectic structure and reduction on the space of Riemannian metrics

2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Ferreiro Pérez ◽  
Jaime Muñoz Masqué
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Gursky ◽  
Jeff A. Viaclovsky

AbstractWe investigate rigidity and stability properties of critical points of quadratic curvature functionals on the space of Riemannian metrics. We show it is possible to “gauge” the Euler–Lagrange equations, in a self-adjoint fashion, to become elliptic. Fredholm theory may then be used to describe local properties of the moduli space of critical metrics. We show a number of compact examples are infinitesimally rigid, and consequently, are isolated critical points in the space of unit-volume Riemannian metrics. We then give examples of critical metrics which are strict local minimizers (up to diffeomorphism and scaling). A corollary is a local “reverse Bishop's inequality” for such metrics. In particular, any metric


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert I. Soare

Abstract. LetMbe a smooth, compact manifold of dimensionn≥ 5 and sectional curvature ∣K∣ ≤ 1. Let Met(M) = Riem(M)/Diff(M) be the space of Riemannian metrics onMmodulo isometries. Nabutovsky and Weinberger studied the connected components of sublevel sets (and local minima) for certain functions on Met(M) such as the diameter. They showed that for every Turing machineTe,eϵ ω, there is a sequence (uniformly effective ine) of homologyn-sphereswhich are also hypersurfaces, such thatis diffeomorphic to the standardn-sphereSn(denoted)iffTehalts on inputk, and in this case the connected sum, so, andis associated with a local minimum of the diameter function on Met(M) whose depth is roughly equal to the settling time ae σe(k)ofTeon inputsy<k.At their request Soare constructed a particular infinite sequence {Ai}ϵωof c.e. sets so that for allithe settling time of the associated Turing machine forAidominates that forAi+1, even when the latter is composed with an arbitrary computable function. From this, Nabutovsky and Weinberger showed that the basins exhibit a “fractal” like behavior with extremely big basins, and very much smaller basins coming off them, and so on. This reveals what Nabutovsky and Weinberger describe in their paper on fractals as “the astonishing richness of the space of Riemannian metrics on a smooth manifold, up to reparametrization.” From the point of view of logic and computability, the Nabutovsky-Weinberger results are especially interesting because: (1) they use c.e. sets to prove structuralcomplexityof the geometry and topology, not merelyundecidabilityresults as in the word problem for groups, Hilbert's Tenth Problem, or most other applications; (2) they usenontrivialinformation about c.e. sets, the Soare sequence {Ai}iϵωabove, not merely Gödel's c.e. noncomputable set K of the 1930's; and (3)withoutusing computability theory there is no known proof that local minima exist even for simple manifolds like the torusT5(see §9.5).


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 901-908
Author(s):  
Philipp Reiser

AbstractLet $M$ be a topological spherical space form, i.e., a smooth manifold whose universal cover is a homotopy sphere. We determine the number of path components of the space and moduli space of Riemannian metrics with positive scalar curvature on $M$ if the dimension of $M$ is at least 5 and $M$ is not simply-connected.


Author(s):  
Bernd Ammann ◽  
Klaus Kröncke ◽  
Olaf Müller

AbstractLorentzian manifolds with parallel spinors are important objects of study in several branches of geometry, analysis and mathematical physics. Their Cauchy problem has recently been discussed by Baum, Leistner and Lischewski, who proved that the problem locally has a unique solution up to diffeomorphisms, provided that the intial data given on a space-like hypersurface satisfy some constraint equations. In this article we provide a method to solve these constraint equations. In particular, any curve (resp. closed curve) in the moduli space of Riemannian metrics on M with a parallel spinor gives rise to a solution of the constraint equations on $$M\times (a,b)$$ M × ( a , b ) (resp. $$M\times S^1$$ M × S 1 ).


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-145
Author(s):  
Brian Clarke ◽  
Dmitry Jakobson ◽  
Niky Kamran ◽  
Lior Silberman ◽  
Jonathan Taylor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document