Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Kumar ◽  
Kam Y. J. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Shape Similarity ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Pose Prediction

D3R Grand Challenge 4: Ligand Similarity and MM-GBSA-Based Pose Prediction and Affinity Ranking for BACE-1 Inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukanya Sasmal ◽  
Léa El Khoury ◽  
David Mobley
Keyword(s):  
Binding Mode ◽  
Energy Estimates ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Pose Prediction ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Data Resource ◽  
Affinity Ranking ◽  
Ligand Similarity ◽  
Bace 1

The Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) Grand Challenges present an opportunity to assess, in the context of a blind predictive challenge, the accuracy and the limits of tools and methodologies designed to help guide pharmaceutical drug discovery projects. Here, we report the results of our participation in the D3R Grand Challenge 4, which focused on predicting the binding poses and affinity ranking for compounds targeting the beta-amyloid precursor protein (BACE-1). Our ligand similarity-based protocol using HYBRID (OpenEye Scientific Software) successfully identified poses close to the native binding mode for most of the ligands with less than 2 A RMSD accuracy. Furthermore, we compared the performance of our HYBRID-based approach to that of AutoDock Vina and Dock 6 and found that HYBRID performed better here for pose prediction. We also conducted end-point free energy estimates on protein-ligand complexes using molecular mechanics combined with generalized Born surface area method (MM-GBSA). We found that the binding affinity ranking based on MM-GBSA scores have poor correlation with the experimental values. Finally, the main lessons from our participation in D3R Grand Challenge 4 suggest that: i) the generation of the macrocycles conformers is a key step for successful pose prediction, ii) the protonation states of the BACE-1 binding site should be treated carefully, iii) the MM-GBSA method could not discriminate well between different predicted binding poses, and iv) the MM-GBSA method does not perform well at predicting protein-ligand binding affinities here.

scholarly journals D3R Grand Challenge 4: prospective pose prediction of BACE1 ligands with AutoDock-GPU

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1071-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Santos-Martins ◽  
Jerome Eberhardt ◽  
Giulia Bianco ◽  
Leonardo Solis-Vasquez ◽  
Francesca Alessandra Ambrosio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Pose Prediction

D3R Grand Challenge 3: Blind Prediction of Protein-Ligand Poses and Affinity Rankings

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zied Gaieb ◽  
Conor Parks ◽  
Michael Chiu ◽  
Huanwang Yang ◽  
Chenghua Shao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Pose Prediction ◽  
Ranking Methods ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Data Resource ◽  
Cross Docking ◽  
Affinity Ranking ◽  
Stage 1

<div><div><div><p>The Drug Design Data Resource aims to test and advance the state of the art in protein-ligand modeling, by holding community-wide blinded, prediction challenges. Here, we report on our third major round, Grand Challenge 3 (GC3). Held 2017-2018, GC3 centered on the protein Cathepsin S and the kinases VEGFR2, JAK2, p38-α, TIE2, and ABL1; and included both pose- prediction and affinity-ranking components. GC3 was structured much like the prior challenges GC2015 and GC2. First, Stage 1 tested pose prediction and affinity ranking methods; then all available crystal structures were released, and Stage 2 tested only affinity rankings, now in the context of the available structures. Unique to GC3 was the addition of a Stage 1b self-docking sub-challenge, in which the protein coordinates from all of the co-crystal structures used in the cross-docking challenge were released, and participants were asked to predict the pose of CatS ligands using these newly released structures. We provide an overview of the outcomes and discuss insights into trends and best-practices.</p></div></div></div>

D3R Grand Challenge 4: Ligand Similarity and MM-GBSA-Based Pose Prediction and Affinity Ranking for BACE-1 Inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukanya Sasmal ◽  
Léa El Khoury ◽  
David Mobley
Keyword(s):  
Binding Mode ◽  
Energy Estimates ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Pose Prediction ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Data Resource ◽  
Affinity Ranking ◽  
Ligand Similarity ◽  
Bace 1

The Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) Grand Challenges present an opportunity to assess, in the context of a blind predictive challenge, the accuracy and the limits of tools and methodologies designed to help guide pharmaceutical drug discovery projects. Here, we report the results of our participation in the D3R Grand Challenge 4, which focused on predicting the binding poses and affinity ranking for compounds targeting the beta-amyloid precursor protein (BACE-1). Our ligand similarity-based protocol using HYBRID (OpenEye Scientific Software) successfully identified poses close to the native binding mode for most of the ligands with less than 2 A RMSD accuracy. Furthermore, we compared the performance of our HYBRID-based approach to that of AutoDock Vina and Dock 6 and found that HYBRID performed better here for pose prediction. We also conducted end-point free energy estimates on protein-ligand complexes using molecular mechanics combined with generalized Born surface area method (MM-GBSA). We found that the binding affinity ranking based on MM-GBSA scores have poor correlation with the experimental values. Finally, the main lessons from our participation in D3R Grand Challenge 4 suggest that: i) the generation of the macrocycles conformers is a key step for successful pose prediction, ii) the protonation states of the BACE-1 binding site should be treated carefully, iii) the MM-GBSA method could not discriminate well between different predicted binding poses, and iv) the MM-GBSA method does not perform well at predicting protein-ligand binding affinities here.

Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Fradera ◽  
Andreas Verras ◽  
Yuan Hu ◽  
Deping Wang ◽  
Hongwu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Pose Prediction

scholarly journals D3R Grand Challenge 4: Ligand Similarity and MM-GBSA-Based Pose Prediction and Affinity Ranking for BACE-1 Inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukanya Sasmal ◽  
Léa El Khoury ◽  
David Mobley
Keyword(s):  
Binding Mode ◽  
Energy Estimates ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Pose Prediction ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Data Resource ◽  
Affinity Ranking ◽  
Ligand Similarity ◽  
Bace 1

The Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) Grand Challenges present an opportunity to assess, in the context of a blind predictive challenge, the accuracy and the limits of tools and methodologies designed to help guide pharmaceutical drug discovery projects. Here, we report the results of our participation in the D3R Grand Challenge 4, which focused on predicting the binding poses and affinity ranking for compounds targeting the beta-amyloid precursor protein (BACE-1). Our ligand similarity-based protocol using HYBRID (OpenEye Scientific Software) successfully identified poses close to the native binding mode for most of the ligands with less than 2 A RMSD accuracy. Furthermore, we compared the performance of our HYBRID-based approach to that of AutoDock Vina and Dock 6 and found that HYBRID performed better here for pose prediction. We also conducted end-point free energy estimates on protein-ligand complexes using molecular mechanics combined with generalized Born surface area method (MM-GBSA). We found that the binding affinity ranking based on MM-GBSA scores have poor correlation with the experimental values. Finally, the main lessons from our participation in D3R Grand Challenge 4 suggest that: i) the generation of the macrocycles conformers is a key step for successful pose prediction, ii) the protonation states of the BACE-1 binding site should be treated carefully, iii) the MM-GBSA method could not discriminate well between different predicted binding poses, and iv) the MM-GBSA method does not perform well at predicting protein-ligand binding affinities here.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document