scholarly journals Local logics, non-monotonicity and defeasible argumentation

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Gustavo A. Bodanza ◽  
Fernando A. Tohm�
2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo A. Bodanza ◽  
Fernando A. Tohm�

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristhian Ariel David Deagustini ◽  
Santiago Emanuel Fulladoza Dalibón ◽  
Sebastián Gottifredi ◽  
Marcelo Alejandro Falappa ◽  
Carlos Iván Chesñevar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pere Pardo ◽  
Sergio Pajares Ferrando ◽  
Eva Onaindia ◽  
Lluís Godo ◽  
Pilar Dellunde

Author(s):  
Rakesh M. Bhatt

This chapter will address the teaching of “post-colonial Englishes,” focusing on the sociopolitical and cultural conditions that enabled changes in English as it was used during, and after, the colonial encounter. To capture the complexity of linguistic hybridities associated with plural identities, our disciplinary discourses of the global use and acquisition of English must (i) liberate the field of World Englishes from the orthodoxies of the past and instead connect it to a more general theory of the sociolinguistics of globalization, and, especially (ii) bring into focus local forms shaped by the local logics of practice. This chapter discusses specific examples of the practice of creativity in grammar, discourse, and sociolinguistic use of World English varieties.


Author(s):  
Fabrizio Macagno ◽  
Douglas Walton

AbstractIn this paper it is shown how certain defeasible argumentation schemes can be used to represent the logical structure of the most common types of argument used for statutory interpretation both in civil and common law. The method is based on an argumentation structure in which the conclusion, namely, the meaning attributed to a legal source, is modeled as a claim that needs that is be supported by pro and con defeasible arguments. The defeasible nature of each scheme is shown by means of critical questions, which identify the default conditions for the accepting interpretative arguments and provide a method for evaluating a given argument as weak or strong.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document