Continuous, non-invasive techniques to determine cardiac output in children after cardiac surgery: evaluation of transesophageal Doppler and electric velocimetry

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Schubert ◽  
Thomas Schmitz ◽  
Markus Weiss ◽  
Nicole Nagdyman ◽  
Michael Huebler ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 625-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessia Mattei ◽  
Emiliano Schena ◽  
Stefano Cecchini ◽  
Paola Proscia ◽  
Paola Saccomandi ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (Sup 2) ◽  
pp. A585
Author(s):  
Joern Bajorat ◽  
Rainer Hofmockel ◽  
Dierk A. Vagts ◽  
Matthias Janda ◽  
Gabriele Noeldge-Schomburg

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arunodaya R. Gujjar ◽  
K. Muralidhar ◽  
Sanjay Banakal ◽  
Ratan Gupta ◽  
Talakad N. Sathyaprabha ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 189-192
Author(s):  
Kana IDO ◽  
Shinsei SAEKI ◽  
Katsumi YUFU ◽  
Natsumi KUMANO ◽  
Takashi MATSUZAKI

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 129-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher F. Tirotta ◽  
Richard G. Lagueruela ◽  
Danielle Madril ◽  
Evelio Velis ◽  
Jorge Ojito ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Arthur Le Gall ◽  
Fabrice Vallée ◽  
Jona Joachim ◽  
Alex Hong ◽  
Joaquim Matéo ◽  
...  

AbstractMulti-beat analysis (MBA) of the radial arterial pressure (AP) waveform is a new method that may improve cardiac output (CO) estimation via modelling of the confounding arterial wave reflection. We evaluated the precision and accuracy using the trending ability of the MBA method to estimate absolute CO and variations (ΔCO) during hemodynamic challenges. We reviewed the hemodynamic challenges (fluid challenge or vasopressors) performed when intra-operative hypotension occurred during non-cardiac surgery. The CO was calculated offline using transesophageal Doppler (TED) waveform (COTED) or via application of the MBA algorithm onto the AP waveform (COMBA) before and after hemodynamic challenges. We evaluated the precision and the accuracy according to the Bland & Altman method. We also assessed the trending ability of the MBA by evaluating the percentage of concordance with 15% exclusion zone between ΔCOMBA and ΔCOTED. A non-inferiority margin was set at 87.5%. Among the 58 patients included, 23 (40%) received at least 1 fluid challenge, and 46 (81%) received at least 1 bolus of vasopressors. Before treatment, the COTED was 5.3 (IQR [4.1–8.1]) l min−1, and the COMBA was 4.1 (IQR [3–5.4]) l min−1. The agreement between COTED and COMBA was poor with a 70% percentage error. The bias and lower and upper limits of agreement between COTED and COMBA were 0.9 (CI95 = 0.82 to 1.07) l min−1, −2.8 (CI95 = −2.71 to−2.96) l min−1 and 4.7 (CI95 = 4.61 to 4.86) l min−1, respectively. After hemodynamic challenge, the percentage of concordance (PC) with 15% exclusion zone for ΔCO was 93 (CI97.5 = 90 to 97)%. In this retrospective offline analysis, the accuracy, limits of agreements and percentage error between TED and MBA for the absolute estimation of CO were poor, but the MBA could adequately track induced CO variations measured by TED. The MBA needs further evaluation in prospective studies to confirm those results in clinical practice conditions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (S1) ◽  
pp. A88-A88
Author(s):  
Ludwik Fedorko ◽  
David Preiss ◽  
Joseph Fisher ◽  
George Djaiani ◽  
Jo Carroll ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document