The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: An Evaluation of the Scale and Its Accompanying Profiler Software in a Clinical Setting

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Young ◽  
Michael J. A. Wohl
2020 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. S144
Author(s):  
B. Zarrouq ◽  
J. El Hilaly ◽  
A. El Asr ◽  
S. Abbouyi ◽  
I. Atemni ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Svetieva ◽  
Michael Walker

"Problem" and "pathological" gambling represent core concepts that guide gambling research today. However, divergent interpretation of the relation between these terms is continually misguiding the measurement and interpretation of empirical data, and may cumulatively lead to larger-scale problems of conclusion and policy formulation over the next decade. This paper first attempts to unravel the conceptual muddle by outlining the trajectory of the usage of the two terms, from a period where both were dimensionally similar concepts firmly situated in the addiction model to a more recent conception, which takes the view that problem gambling is distinct and properly measured by focusing on the problems that excessive gambling may cause to individuals, families, and communities. We then aim to analyse and criticize the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) as a clear example of the confusion of paradigms, an index that defines problem gambling in the newer, problem-centred model, but continues to measure it with items reflecting the older, addiction-centred model. We argue that results obtained using the CPGI, much like those of its predecessors, will not adequately capture the notion of harm that underpins current definitions of problem gambling.


Author(s):  
J. Ferris ◽  
H. Wynne ◽  
E. Single

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena C. Quilty ◽  
Chris Watson ◽  
Michael R. Bagby

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soonmook Lee ◽  
Jungeun Cha ◽  
Sung Chil Yeo ◽  
Jong-Nam Kim ◽  
윤수철

1977 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Ratusnik ◽  
Roy A. Koenigsknecht

Six speech and language clinicians, three black and three white, administered the Goodenough Drawing Test (1926) to 144 preschoolers. The four groups, lower socioeconomic black and white and middle socioeconomic black and white, were divided equally by sex. The biracial clinical setting was shown to influence test scores in black preschool-age children.


Author(s):  
Diane L. Kendall

Purpose The purpose of this article was to extend the concepts of systems of oppression in higher education to the clinical setting where communication and swallowing services are delivered to geriatric persons, and to begin a conversation as to how clinicians can disrupt oppression in their workplace. Conclusions As clinical service providers to geriatric persons, it is imperative to understand systems of oppression to affect meaningful change. As trained speech-language pathologists and audiologists, we hold power and privilege in the medical institutions in which we work and are therefore obligated to do the hard work. Suggestions offered in this article are only the start of this important work.


2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
DAMIAN McNAMARA
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document