‘Political Controversy and Social Science Public Funding’: A Review of Mark Solovey, Social Science for What? Battles over Public Funding for the “Other Sciences” at the National Science Foundation

Minerva ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jialu Xie
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Hirschman

A Review of “Social Science for What? Battles over Public Funding for the "Other Sciences" at the National Science Foundation” by Mark Solovey.


1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
DESMOND KING

In the twenty years after 1945 both the United States and Britain created public funding regimes for social science, through the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) respectively. The historical and political contexts in which these institutions were founded differed, but the assumptions about social science concurred. This article uses archival sources to explain this comparative pattern. It is argued that the political context in both countries played a key role in the development of the two research agencies. In each country the need politically to stress the neutrality of social research – though for different reasons in each case – produced a bias towards positivist scientific methodology, untempered by ideology. This propensity created the trajectory upon which each country's public funding regime rests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document