scholarly journals Correction to: Can the application of farm dairy effluent enhance cadmium leachingfrom soil?

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (36) ◽  
pp. 50930-50930
Author(s):  
Colin William Gray ◽  
Gina Maria Lucci ◽  
Jo-Anne Cavanagh
2016 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.J. van der Weerden ◽  
N. Cox ◽  
J. Luo ◽  
H.J. Di ◽  
A. Podolyan ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 309 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 119-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiafa Luo ◽  
Surinder Saggar ◽  
Rita Bhandral ◽  
Nanthi Bolan ◽  
Stewart Ledgard ◽  
...  

Soil Research ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Houlbrooke ◽  
D. J. Horne ◽  
M. J. Hedley ◽  
V. O. Snow ◽  
J. A. Hanly

Spray irrigation of farm dairy effluent (FDE) to artificially drained land in accordance with deferred irrigation criteria causes minimal direct drainage of partially treated FDE at the time of irrigation. The influence of deferred irrigation of FDE on the subsequent nutrient enrichment of winter–spring drainage from mole and pipe systems is unknown. Research was conducted in the Manawatu region, New Zealand, to investigate the influence of deferred irrigation of FDE on the quality of water in artificial drainage. The experimental site was established on a Pallic soil (Tokomaru silt loam) at the No. 4 dairy farm at Massey University, Palmerston North. There were 6 plots (each 40 m by 40 m), each with an isolated mole and pipe drainage network. Four of the plots received fertiliser according to the farm’s fertiliser program (non-effluent plots), while the other 2 plots received applications of FDE according to the deferred irrigation scheduling criteria (effluent plots). All of the plots were subject to the farm’s standard grazing management.The average concentrations of N and P in the 2003 winter drainage (average 236 mm) from both the non-effluent and FDE irrigated plots were well above the threshold concentrations that stimulate aquatic weed growth in fresh water bodies. Annual nutrient losses of 31.4 kg N ha/year and 0.65 kg P ha/year in drainage were recorded for non-effluent plots. Deferred irrigation of FDE in the summer period did not increase the loss of N in winter–spring drainage (N loss from effluent plots was 31.1 kg N ha/year) but did cause a significant increase (P < 0.001) in total P in drainage (an additional 1.03 kg P/ha, c. 160% of losses from non-effluent plots, a loss of 3.3% of applied P). Furthermore, an irrigation of FDE to near-saturated soil in mid September resulted in the direct drainage of partially treated effluent, and hence, N and P concentrations in drainage were 6–10-fold greater than those that would normally be expected from drainage events induced by winter–spring rainfall. This illustrates the importance of scheduling FDE irrigation in accordance with deferred irrigation principles.


2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 1683-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. Shams ◽  
N. Singhal ◽  
P. Elefsiniotis ◽  
A. Johnson

Biological removal of nitrogen and carbon from farm dairy effluent (FDE) was studied with two laboratory-scale systems following nitrification and denitrification processes. Each system consisted of an upflow multilayer bioreactor (UMBR) as a pre-denitrification unit, an aeration tank (AT) as nitrification unit and a secondary clarifier. The optimization of two operational variables, total hydraulic retention time (HRT) and internal recycle (IR) rate with both real-FDE and a synthetic-wastewater were investigated. First, HRTs of 2, 3, 4 and 5 days were tested with synthetic-wastewater at uniform IR rate. The HRT of 4 days proved optimum with high efficiencies for nitrification (&gt;90%), denitrification (&gt;90%) and total chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal (∼90%). The lowest efficiency was recorded at 2 days HRT with 7% nitrification efficiency. This was followed by experimentation with IR rates of 200%, 300% and 400% on both real-FDE and synthetic-wastewater at optimized HRT. The increase in IR to 300% improved the denitrification potential and overall performance with continuous high nitrification efficiency and COD removal whereas IR of 400% retarded the process. The application of combined UMBR and activated sludge system showed good potential for biological removal of nitrogen from FDE.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Joo Le Guen ◽  
Valentin Thoury-Monbrun ◽  
José M. Castellano Roldán ◽  
Stefan J. Hill

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document