Salt tolerance of the annual halophyte Cakile maritima as affected by the provenance and the developmental stage

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wided Megdiche ◽  
Nader Ben Amor ◽  
Ahmed Debez ◽  
Kamel Hessini ◽  
Riadh Ksouri ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 64-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Debez ◽  
Kilani Ben Rejeb ◽  
Mohamed Ali Ghars ◽  
Mohamed Gandour ◽  
Wided Megdiche ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Karim Ben Hamed ◽  
Ibtissem Ben Hamad ◽  
François Bouteau ◽  
Chedly Abdelly

HortScience ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven H. Goertz ◽  
Janice M. Coons

Seeds of two tepary bean lines (Phaseolus acutifolius Gray var. latifolius) and one navy bean cultivar (P. vulgaris L. `Fleetwood') were tested with 0.0-, – 0.3-, –0.6-, -0.9-, -1.2-, or – 1.5-MPa NaCl solutions to determine their relative salt tolerance during germination and emergence. Developmental stage was not affected at – 0.3 MPa, but with salinities more negative than -0.9 MPa, `Fleetwood' developed more slowly than the tepary lines; no plants emerged at – 1.5 MPa. Teparies tended to maintain higher water and osmotic potentials than navy over the range of NaCl concentrations used, although turgor was similar for all three genotypes. Leaf area was reduced more in navy than in white tepary at – 0.6 and – 0.9 MPa. Dry weights of navy were higher than those of either tepary bean at all NaCl concentrations, although decreases at higher salinities relative to 0.0 MPa were greater for navy than for teparies. Root: shoot ratios were higher at – 0.3 MPa than at 0.0 MPa, but were lower at the higher NaCl concentrations for all three genotypes. Overall, tepary beans tolerated NaCl better than navy. The characteristic that best indicated differences in salt tolerance was developmental stage.


1992 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl A. Telmer ◽  
Daina H. Simmonds ◽  
William Newcomb

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Ribeirinho Leite ◽  
Cory David Barker ◽  
Marc G. Lucas

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Lamport Commons ◽  
Patrice Marie Miller

2009 ◽  
Vol 221 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
JH Klusmann ◽  
FJ Godinho ◽  
K Heitmann ◽  
T Pushpanathan ◽  
D Reinhardt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document