Upper mantle seismic anisotropy beneath the Kachchh rift zone, Gujarat, India, from shear wave splitting analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhoopendra Singh ◽  
Prantik Mandal
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Rift Zone ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Wave Splitting

Seismic anisotropy of the crust and upper mantle beneath western Tibet revealed by shear wave splitting measurements

2018 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. 535-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhui Ju ◽  
Junmeng Zhao ◽  
Ning Huang ◽  
Qiang Xu ◽  
Hongbing Liu
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Crust And Upper Mantle ◽  
Wave Splitting

Mantle flow under the Central Alps: Constraints from non-vertical-ray SKS shear-wave splittting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Löberich ◽  
Götz Bokelmann
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Depth Resolution ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Mantle Flow ◽  
Central Alps ◽  
Upper Mantle Anisotropy ◽  
Wave Splitting

<p>The association of seismic anisotropy and deformation, as e.g. exploited by shear-wave splitting measurements, provides a unique opportunity to map the orientation of geodynamic processes in the upper mantle and to constraint their nature. However, due to the limited depth-resolution of steeply arriving core-phases, used for shear-wave splitting investigations, it appears difficult to differentiate between asthenospheric and lithospheric origins of observed seismic anisotropy. To change that, we take advantage of the different backazimuthal variations of fast orientation <em>φ</em> and delay time <em>Δt</em>, when considering the non-vertical incidence of phases passing through an olivine block with vertical b-axis as opposed to one with vertical c-axis. Both these alignments can occur depending on the type of deformation, e.g. a sub-horizontal foliation orientation in the case of a simple asthenospheric flow and a sub-vertical foliation when considering vertically-coherent deformation in the lithosphere. In this study we investigate the cause of seismic anisotropy in the Central Alps. Combining high-quality manual shear-wave splitting measurements of three datasets leads to a dense station coverage. Fast orientations <em>φ</em> show a spatially coherent and relatively simple mountain-chain-parallel pattern, likely related to a single-layer case of upper mantle anisotropy. Considering the measurements of the whole study area together, our non-vertical-ray shear-wave splitting procedure points towards a b-up olivine situation and thus favors an asthenospheric anisotropy source, with a horizontal flow plane of deformation. We also test the influence of position relative to the European slab, distinguishing a northern and southern subarea based on vertically-integrated travel times through a tomographic model. Differences in the statistical distribution of splitting parameters <em>φ</em> and <em>Δt</em>, and in the backazimuthal variation of <em>δφ</em> and <em>δΔt</em>, become apparent. While the observed seismic anisotropy in the northern subarea shows indications of asthenospheric flow, likely a depth-dependent plane Couette-Poiseuille flow around the Alps, the origin in the southern subarea remains more difficult to determine and may also contain effects from the slab itself.</p>

scholarly journals Upper mantle seismic anisotropy beneath the West Antarctic Rift System and surrounding region from shear wave splitting analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 198 (1) ◽  
pp. 414-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. Accardo ◽  
D. A. Wiens ◽  
S. Hernandez ◽  
R. C. Aster ◽  
A. Nyblade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Rift System ◽  
The West ◽  
West Antarctic ◽  
Wave Splitting ◽  
West Antarctic Rift System ◽  
West Antarctic Rift

scholarly journals Flow plane orientation in the upper mantle under the Western/Central United States from SKS shear-wave splitting observations

2020 ◽  
Vol 221 (2) ◽  
pp. 1125-1137
Author(s):  
Eric Löberich ◽  
Götz Bokelmann
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Azimuthal Dependence ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Wave Splitting ◽  
Central United States ◽  
Flow Plane

SUMMARY The causes of seismic anisotropy are still under debate. In particular, it is important to understand the extent to which seismic anisotropy is due to more recent geodynamic activities in the asthenosphere, or to frozen-in deformation in the lithosphere. We show that these two endmember cases can in principle be distinguished using shear-wave splitting observations from SKS waves. This is illustrated by the simple example of pure olivine with horizontal a-axis, and differing orientations of the other two axes, namely, vertical b and vertical c. The azimuthal dependence of shear-wave splitting measurements is described by two parameters, which can provide additional information about subsurface deformation. In particular, the oscillation parameter d1 constrains the orientation of foliation. We demonstrate that shear-wave splitting in the Western and Central United States indeed shows the predicted azimuthal dependence, related to a mainly subhorizontally oriented flow plane of deformation in the upper mantle. This has important implications for asthenospheric flow.

Investigating Seismic Anisotropy of the Madeira and Canaries Hotspots Using Teleseismic and Local Shear-Wave Splitting with the SIGHT project

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Schlaphorst ◽  
Graça Silveira ◽  
João Mata
Keyword(s):  
Iberian Peninsula ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Canary Islands ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Western Africa ◽  
Wave Splitting ◽  
Local Shear ◽  
North Western

<p>Madeira and the Canary Islands, located in the eastern North Atlantic, are two of many examples of hotspot surface expressions. Their tracks have been reconstructed to past locations close to the south-western part of the Iberian Peninsula and north-western Africa, respectively. Furthermore, due to their close proximity, an interconnected origin of these two hotspots has been proposed but details remain unclear. A better understanding of the crust and upper mantle structure beneath these islands is needed to investigate this potential connection.</p><p>The subsurface structure has an influence on the stress field, which can be investigated studying seismic anisotropy patterns of the region. Seismic anisotropy leads to variations in the speed of seismic waves as a function of the direction of wave propagation. In the crust an orientation in the direction of maximum stress is observed, commonly being parallel to the alignment of fractures or cracks. In the upper mantle the orientation is influenced by mantle flow. A widely used method to identify anisotropy is the observation of shear-wave splitting of data from teleseismic events. In case of multiple anisotropic layers, including measurements from local events it is possible to distinguish crustal from upper mantle influences.</p><p>As part of the SIGHT project (SeIsmic and Geochemical constraints on the Madeira HoTspot), we carried out the first detailed study of seismic anisotropy beneath both archipelagos, using teleseismic SKS and local shear-wave splitting measurements of data collected from land stations of seismic networks located on Madeira and the Canary Islands.</p><p>Significant changes, both in orientation and delay time, can be observed on short length-scales on the order of tens of kilometres, matching major geological features such as, for example, the major rift zone on Madeira island. In a further step, we compare these results to previous studies of crustal and upper mantle anisotropy focusing on north-western Africa and the Iberian Peninsula to investigate the nature of the lithospheric corridor between the present day hotspot positions and the Atlas-Gibraltar region.</p><p>This is a contribution to project SIGHT (Ref. PTDC/CTA-GEF/30264/2017). The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support FCT through project UIDB/50019/2020 – IDL.</p>

scholarly journals Mantle flow under the Central Alps: Constraints from non-vertical SKS shear-wave splitting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Löberich ◽  
Götz Bokelmann
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Depth Resolution ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Mantle Flow ◽  
Central Alps ◽  
Upper Mantle Anisotropy ◽  
Wave Splitting

Abstract. The association of seismic anisotropy and deformation, as e.g. exploited by shear-wave splitting measurements, provides a unique opportunity to map the orientation of geodynamic processes in the upper mantle and to constraint their nature. However, due to the limited depth-resolution of steeply arriving core-phases, used for shear-wave splitting investigations, it appears difficult to differentiate between asthenospheric and lithospheric origins of observed seismic anisotropy. To change that, we take advantage of the different backazimuthal variations of fast orientation ϕ and delay time Δt, when considering the non-vertical incidence of phases passing through an olivine block with vertical b-axis as opposed to one with vertical c-axis. Both these alignments can occur depending on the type of deformation, e.g. a sub-horizontal foliation orientation in the case of a simple asthenospheric flow and a sub-vertical foliation when considering vertically-coherent deformation in the lithosphere. In this study we investigate the cause of seismic anisotropy in the Central Alps. Combining high-quality shear-wave splitting measurements of three datasets leads to a dense station coverage. Fast orientations ϕ show a spatially coherent and relatively simple mountain-chain-parallel pattern, likely related to a single-layer case of upper mantle anisotropy. Considering the measurements of the whole study area together, our non-vertical-ray shear-wave splitting procedure points towards a b-up olivine situation and thus favors an asthenospheric anisotropy source, with a horizontal flow plane of deformation. We also test the influence of position relative to the European slab, distinguishing a northern and southern subarea based on vertically-integrated travel times through a tomographic model. Differences in the statistical distribution of splitting parameters ϕ and Δt, and in the backazimuthal variation of δϕ and δΔt, become apparent. While the observed seismic anisotropy in the northern subarea shows indications of asthenospheric flow, likely a depth-dependent plane Couette-Poiseuille flow around the Alps, the origin in the southern subarea remains more difficult to determine and may also contain effects from the slab itself.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document