Systematic Review of Intra Parotid Facial Nerve Schwannoma and a Case Report

Author(s):  
Akhilesh Kumar Singh ◽  
Janani Anand Kumar ◽  
Naresh Kumar Sharma ◽  
Arun Pandey ◽  
Nitesh Mishra ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e239407
Author(s):  
Stuti Chowdhary ◽  
Saranya Thangavel ◽  
Sivaraman Ganesan ◽  
Arun Alexander

Schwannomas of the eighth nerve are common, usually found in syndromic association with neurofibromatosis-2. The occurrence of seventh nerve schwannoma, especially in its extratemporal course, is very rare. Here, we present a case report of an extratemporal facial nerve schwannoma diagnosed preoperatively with cytopathology and postoperative histopathologic confirmation. Histopathology provides the confirmatory diagnosis in such cases. An atypical diagnosis of neural schwannomas should be kept in mind when facial palsy is clinically encountered in the absence of any other aetiological factors.


2011 ◽  
Vol 121 (S4) ◽  
pp. S119-S119
Author(s):  
BC Gross ◽  
ML Carlson ◽  
B Scheithauer ◽  
CLW Driscoll ◽  
EJ Moore

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 679-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.S. Salemis ◽  
A. Karameris ◽  
S. Gourgiotis ◽  
P. Stavrinou ◽  
K. Nazos ◽  
...  

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu-Guan Bian ◽  
Qing-Fang Sun ◽  
Wuttipong Tirakotai ◽  
Wei-Guo Zhao ◽  
Helmut Bertalanffy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 30,31
Author(s):  
Alicia M. Restrepo ◽  
Dana R. Libman ◽  
C. Scott Brown ◽  
Fred F. Telischi

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Ingrosso ◽  
Elisabetta Ponti ◽  
Daniela di Cristino ◽  
Sara Terenzi ◽  
Sara Cicchetti ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bacem A.E.O. Khalele

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Juliana Rotter ◽  
Victor M. Lu ◽  
Christopher S. Graffeo ◽  
Avital Perry ◽  
Colin L. W. Driscoll ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEIntracranial facial nerve schwannomas (FNS) requiring treatment are frequently recommended for surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The objective of this study was to compare facial nerve function outcomes between these two interventions for FNS via a systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODSA search of the Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases from inception to July 2019 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against prespecified criteria. Facial nerve outcomes were classified as improved, stabilized, or worsened by last follow-up. Incidence was pooled by random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.RESULTSThirty-three articles with a pooled cohort of 519 patients with FNS satisfied all criteria. Twenty-five articles described operative outcomes in 407 (78%) patients; 10 articles reported SRS outcomes in 112 (22%). In the surgical cohort, facial nerve function improved in 23% (95% CI 15%–32%), stabilized in 41% (95% CI 32%–50%), and worsened in 30% (95% CI 21%–40%). In the SRS cohort, facial nerve function was improved in 20% (95% CI 9%–34%), stable in 66% (95% CI 54%–78%), and worsened in 9% (95% CI 3%–16%). Compared with SRS, microsurgery was associated with a significantly lower incidence of stable facial nerve function (p < 0.01) and a significantly higher incidence of worsened facial nerve function (p < 0.01). Tumor progression and complication rates were comparable. Outcome certainty assessments were very low to moderate for all parameters.CONCLUSIONSUnfavorable facial nerve function outcomes are associated with surgical treatment of intracranial FNS, whereas stable facial nerve function outcomes are associated with SRS. Therefore, SRS should be recommended to patients with FNS who require treatment, and surgery should be reserved for patients with another indication, such as decompression of the brainstem. Further study is required to definitively optimize and validate management strategies for these rare skull base tumors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document