scholarly journals Neuroethics and Philosophy in Responsible Research and Innovation: The Case of the Human Brain Project

Neuroethics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arleen Salles ◽  
Kathinka Evers ◽  
Michele Farisco
Keyword(s):  
Human Brain ◽  
Responsible Research And Innovation ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Human Brain Project ◽  
Responsible Research

scholarly journals Taking knowledge production seriously in responsible research and innovation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Robert D.J. Smith ◽  
Zara Thokozani Kamwendo ◽  
Anja Berndt ◽  
Jamie Parkin
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Responsible Research And Innovation ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Responsible Research

scholarly journals A comprehensive appraisal of responsible research and innovation: From roots to leaves

2021 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 121053
Author(s):  
Martijn Wiarda ◽  
Geerten van de Kaa ◽  
Emad Yaghmaei ◽  
Neelke Doorn
Keyword(s):  
Responsible Research And Innovation ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Responsible Research

scholarly journals Contextualizing Security Innovation: Responsible Research and Innovation at the Smart Border?

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Klimburg-Witjes ◽  
Frederik C. Huettenrauch
Keyword(s):  
New Technologies ◽  
Border Security ◽  
Responsible Research And Innovation ◽  
Political Agenda ◽  
Socially Responsible ◽  
Political Actors ◽  
Security Technologies ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Societal Needs ◽  
Responsible Research

AbstractCurrent European innovation and security policies are increasingly channeled into efforts to address the assumed challenges that threaten European societies. A field in which this has become particularly salient is digitized EU border management. Here, the framework of responsible research and innovation (RRI) has recently been used to point to the alleged sensitivity of political actors towards the contingent dimensions of emerging security technologies. RRI, in general, is concerned with societal needs and the engagement and inclusion of various stakeholder groups in the research and innovation processes, aiming to anticipate undesired consequences of and identifying socially acceptable alternatives for emerging technologies. However, RRI has also been criticized as an industry-driven attempt to gain societal legitimacy for new technologies. In this article, we argue that while RRI evokes a space where different actors enter co-creative dialogues, it lays bare the specific challenges of governing security innovation in socially responsible ways. Empirically, we draw on the case study of BODEGA, the first EU funded research project to apply the RRI framework to the field of border security. We show how stakeholders involved in the project represent their work in relation to RRI and the resulting benefits and challenges they face. The paper argues that applying the framework to the field of (border) security lays bare its limitations, namely that RRI itself embodies a political agenda, conceals alternative experiences by those on whom security is enacted upon and that its key propositions of openness and transparency are hardly met in practice due to confidentiality agreements. Our hope is to contribute to work on RRI and emerging debates about how the concept can (or cannot) be contextualized for the field of security—a field that might be more in need than any other to consider the ethical dimension of its activities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document