Relapse of chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase 14 years after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

2008 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daigo Akahane ◽  
Yoshikazu Ito ◽  
Masahiko Sumi ◽  
Tetsuzo Tauchi ◽  
Yukihiko Kimura ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5518-5518
Author(s):  
Liu Xiaoli ◽  
Guanlun Gao ◽  
Xuan Zhou ◽  
Na Xu ◽  
Yajuan Xiao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Objective Following the introduction of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) scene in CML has changed dramatically. This retrospective cohort study was designed to compare medical outcomes of Imatinib mesylate and allo-HSCT for patients with CML in chronic phase. Patients and Methods From February 2002 to February 2012, 198 patients treated consecutively at the Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University were assigned to two groups according to treatment with imatinib or allo-HSCT. One hundred fifteen cases of imatinib group were given imatinib at an initial dose of 400mg daily and the dose was then adjusted according to the patient´s blood and therapy response. All the patients were evaluated for hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular response every 1-3months. Eighty-three cases of allo-HSCT group received myeloablative preconditioning regimen, and methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine A (CsA) were used for graft-versus-host disease(GVHD), parts combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and antihuman thymocyte globulin(ATG). The primary end points of the study were complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), relapse rate, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after therapy. Results In total, 59 (68.9%) patients treated over 12 months achieved a CCyR after 12 months in imatinib group, while 67 (95.7%) patients in allo-HSCT group. The relapse rates were 14.8% (n=17) in imatinib group and 10.8% (n=9) in allo-HSCT group (P=0.456). Ten-year cumulative OS rates were 93.9% in imatinib group and 77.1% in allo-HSCT group(P=0.015) and ten- year cumulative PFS rates of two groups were 86.1% vs.88.0%(P=0.508). For Sokal rating stratified analysis, the ten-year OS rates of two groups were 96.4% vs.68.0% (P = 0.049) for high-risk patients,92.6% vs. 57.1% (P = 0.019) for intermediate-risk patients , while the ten-year PFS rates of two groups were 89.3% vs. 88.0% for high-risk patients (P = 0.942), 70.4% vs. 85.7% for intermediate-risk patients (P = 0.405).The ten-year OS rates and PFS rates were not significant difference for low-risk patients. The cumulative OS rates of two groups were 94.7% vs. 73.5%(P=0.019)for the patients who were not less than 30 years old,and the cumulative PFS rates of two groups were 84.2% vs. 94.1% respectively (P=0.147). Conclusion Imatinib mesylate treatment is superior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luize Otero ◽  
Maria Helena Ornellas ◽  
Alexandre Mello de Azevedo ◽  
Rita de Cássia Tavares ◽  
Virgínia Pires ◽  
...  

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), karyotyping is a valuable tool for monitoring engraftment and disease status. Few studies have examined the prognostic significance of karyotypes in patients who underwent HSCT for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The objective of this study was to evaluate the significance of pretransplantation cytogenetic status in relation to outcomes following HSCT in CML patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Case series study at Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. METHODS: Cytogenetic analysis was performed by G banding on 39 patients treated with HSCT. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were in the chronic phase and eight were in the accelerated phase. Prior to HSCT, additional chromosomal abnormalities on the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome were found in 11 patients. The most frequent additional abnormality was a double Ph, which was observed in four cases. Following HSCT, full chimeras were observed in 31 patients (79.5%). Among these, 23 (82.3%) had presented Ph as the sole abnormality. Mixed chimeras were observed in seven patients, of which three had additional abnormalities. Only one case did not present any cytogenetic response. Five patients presented cytogenetic relapse associated with clinical relapse following HSCT. Twenty-seven patients are still alive and present complete hematological and cytogenetic remission. CONCLUSION: In our study, the presence of additional abnormalities was not associated with worse outcome and relapse risk. Also, no differences in survival rates were observed. Our study supports the view that classical cytogenetic analysis remains an important tool regarding HSCT outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document