Surgical Management of Gallbladder Carcinoma

Author(s):  
Vivek Srivastava ◽  
Khushi Verma ◽  
Puneet
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian‐Run Lv ◽  
Hai‐Jie Hu ◽  
Parbatraj Regmi ◽  
Fei Liu ◽  
Fu‐Yu Li

Author(s):  
F Löhe ◽  
G Meimarakis ◽  
C Schauer ◽  
M Angele ◽  
KW Jauch ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S350
Author(s):  
J. Sakata ◽  
Y. Hirose ◽  
K. Yuza ◽  
K. Miura ◽  
T. Katada ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Yildirim ◽  
O. Celen ◽  
K. Gulben ◽  
U. Berberoglu

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1541-1551 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Creasy ◽  
Debra A. Goldman ◽  
Mithat Gonen ◽  
Vikas Dudeja ◽  
Eileen M. O'Reilly ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Kun-Ming Chan ◽  
Yu-Ling Liu

Gallbladder masses as part of gallbladder pathology are commonly encountered at clinical scenario. However, it is important to distinguish between benign and malignant conditions in terms of clinical significance and management. While few gallbladder masses may present with unusual or nonspecific imaging appearances that is not easy to characterize gallbladder pathology. This report herein showed an elderly patient with a gallbladder mass accompanied by diffuse wall thickness of gallbladder that were similar to clinical characteristic of gallbladder cancer. Under thoughtfully surgical management, this patient was recovery very well from the operation and end up with a pleasant result of chronic cholecystitis instead of gallbladder carcinoma. Therefore, patients with a gallbladder mass are not definitively related to malignancy but should also be kept in mind the possibility of carcinoma. As long as pathological diagnosis is confirmed, surgical management with a therapeutic intent based on suitable clinical circumstances should be attempted.


2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1188-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin L. Mekeel ◽  
Alan W. Hemming

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 857-869
Author(s):  
Oksana A. Jackson ◽  
Alison E. Kaye

Purpose The purpose of this tutorial was to describe the surgical management of palate-related abnormalities associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Craniofacial differences in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome may include overt or occult clefting of the palate and/or lip along with oropharyngeal variances that may lead to velopharyngeal dysfunction. This chapter will describe these circumstances, including incidence, diagnosis, and indications for surgical intervention. Speech assessment and imaging of the velopharyngeal system will be discussed as it relates to preoperative evaluation and surgical decision making. Important for patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is appropriate preoperative screening to assess for internal carotid artery positioning, cervical spine abnormalities, and obstructive sleep apnea. Timing of surgery as well as different techniques, common complications, and outcomes will also be discussed. Conclusion Management of velopharyngeal dysfunction in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is challenging and requires thoughtful preoperative assessment and planning as well as a careful surgical technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document