Two Stage Inverse Adaptive Cluster Sampling With Stopping Rule Depends upon the Size of Cluster

Sankhya B ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raosaheb V. Latpate ◽  
Jayant K. Kshirsagar
2021 ◽  
pp. 241-255
Author(s):  
Raosaheb Latpate ◽  
Jayant Kshirsagar ◽  
Vinod Kumar Gupta ◽  
Girish Chandra

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-357
Author(s):  
Mohammad Moradi ◽  
Jennifer A. Brown ◽  
Weilong Guo

Biometrics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Salehi M. ◽  
George A. F. Seber

2021 ◽  
pp. 193-202
Author(s):  
Raosaheb Latpate ◽  
Jayant Kshirsagar ◽  
Vinod Kumar Gupta ◽  
Girish Chandra

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
Stefania Naddeo ◽  
Caterina Pisani

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Antonio Gattone ◽  
Esha Mohamed ◽  
Tonio Di Battista

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255256
Author(s):  
Mohammad Salehi ◽  
David R. Smith

Sampling rare and clustered populations is challenging because of the effort required to find rare units. Heuristically, a practitioner would prefer to discontinue sampling in areas where rare units of interest are apparently extremely sparse or absent. We take advantage of the characteristics of inverse sampling to adaptively inform practitioners when it is efficient to move on to sample new areas. We introduce Adaptive Two-stage Inverse Sampling (ATIS), which is designed to leave a selected area after observation of an a priori number of only non-rare units and to continue sampling in the area when rare units are observed. ATIS is efficient in many cases and yields more rare units than conventional sampling for a rare and clustered population. We derive unbiased estimators of population total and variance. We also introduce an easy-to-compute estimator, which is nearly as efficient as the unbiased estimator. A simulation study on a rare plant population of buttercups (Ranunculus) shows that ATIS even with the easy-to-compute estimator is more efficient than its conventional sampling counterparts and is more efficient than Two-stage Adaptive Cluster Sampling (TACS) for small and moderate final sample sizes. Additional simulations reveal that ATIS is efficient for binary data (e.g., presence or absence) whereas TACS is inefficient for binary data. The overall results indicate that ATIS is consistently efficient compared to conventional sampling and to adaptive cluster sampling in some important cases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. V. Latpate ◽  
J. K. Kshirsagar

2013 ◽  
Vol 161 (9) ◽  
pp. 632-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Antonio Gattone ◽  
Mohamed Esha ◽  
Jesse Wachira Mwangi

2002 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-95
Author(s):  
A. Khan ◽  
H.A. Muttlak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document