scholarly journals Adaptive two-stage inverse sampling design to estimate density, abundance, and occupancy of rare and clustered populations

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255256
Author(s):  
Mohammad Salehi ◽  
David R. Smith

Sampling rare and clustered populations is challenging because of the effort required to find rare units. Heuristically, a practitioner would prefer to discontinue sampling in areas where rare units of interest are apparently extremely sparse or absent. We take advantage of the characteristics of inverse sampling to adaptively inform practitioners when it is efficient to move on to sample new areas. We introduce Adaptive Two-stage Inverse Sampling (ATIS), which is designed to leave a selected area after observation of an a priori number of only non-rare units and to continue sampling in the area when rare units are observed. ATIS is efficient in many cases and yields more rare units than conventional sampling for a rare and clustered population. We derive unbiased estimators of population total and variance. We also introduce an easy-to-compute estimator, which is nearly as efficient as the unbiased estimator. A simulation study on a rare plant population of buttercups (Ranunculus) shows that ATIS even with the easy-to-compute estimator is more efficient than its conventional sampling counterparts and is more efficient than Two-stage Adaptive Cluster Sampling (TACS) for small and moderate final sample sizes. Additional simulations reveal that ATIS is efficient for binary data (e.g., presence or absence) whereas TACS is inefficient for binary data. The overall results indicate that ATIS is consistently efficient compared to conventional sampling and to adaptive cluster sampling in some important cases.

2021 ◽  
pp. 241-255
Author(s):  
Raosaheb Latpate ◽  
Jayant Kshirsagar ◽  
Vinod Kumar Gupta ◽  
Girish Chandra

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-357
Author(s):  
Mohammad Moradi ◽  
Jennifer A. Brown ◽  
Weilong Guo

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-66
Author(s):  
Dennis Peque ◽  

This paper presents adaptive cluster sampling (ACS) as a method of assessing forest biodiversity. In this study, ACS was used to estimate the abundance of ecologically sparse population of Diospyros philippinensis (Desrousseaux) within the Visayas State University Forest Reserve. Its statistical efficiency were analyzed by comparing them to the conventional systematic sampling (Syst) estimator. Results indicated that adaptive cluster sampling (ACS) plots captured more trees into the sample compared to systematic sampling (Syst) plots. In addition, ACS estimates for mean and total numbers of individuals per ha was higher than systematic sampling estimates and in terms of variance ACS gave substantially lower variance than systematic sampling. However, the ratio of the adjusted SE of ACS to the adjusted SE of systematic sampling for each species and the combined data of the two species was generally lesser than 1 which means that ACS was not a better design than systematic sampling.


1980 ◽  
Vol 29 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 35-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sengupta

The symmetrized Des Raj estimator for a finite population total based on a PPSWOR sample of size two is shown to be admissible within (i) the class of all linear estimators and (ii) the class of all unbiased estimators. In this connection we have obtained a class of admissible linear estimators of the population total which includes the sample mean multiplied by the population size and the classical ratio estimator for any arbitrary sampling design.


2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 663-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Ojiambo ◽  
H. Scherm

Conventional sampling designs such as simple random sampling (SRS) tend to be inefficient when assessing rare and highly clustered populations because most of the time is spent evaluating empty quadrats, leading to high error variances and high cost. In previous studies with rare plant and animal populations, adaptive cluster sampling, where sampling occurs preferentially in the neighborhood of quadrats in which the species of interest is detected during the sampling bout, has been shown to estimate population parameters with greater precision at an effort comparable to SRS. Here, we use computer simulations to evaluate the efficiency of adaptive cluster sampling for estimating low levels of disease incidence (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%) at various levels of aggregation of infected plants having variance-to-mean ratios (V/M) of ≈1, 3, 5, and 10. For each simulation, an initial sample size of 50, 100, and 150 quadrats was evaluated, and the condition to adapt neighborhood sampling (CA), i.e., the minimum number of infected plants per quadrat that triggers a switch from random sampling to sampling in neighboring quadrats, was varied from 1 to 4 (corresponding to 7.7 to 30.8% incidence of infected plants per quadrat). The simulations showed that cluster sampling was consistently more precise than SRS at a field-level disease incidence of 0.1 and 0.5%, especially when diseased plants were highly aggregated (V/M = 5 or 10) and when the most liberal condition to adapt (CA = 1) was used. One drawback of adaptive cluster sampling is that the final sample size is unknown at the beginning of the sampling bout because it depends on how often neighborhood sampling is triggered. In our simulations, the final sample size was close to the initial sample size for disease incidence up to 1.0%, especially when a more conservative condition to adapt (CA > 1) was used. For these conditions, the effect of disease aggregation was minor. In summary, both precision and the sample size required with adaptive cluster sampling responded similarly to disease incidence and aggregation, i.e., both were most favorable at the lowest disease incidence with the highest levels of clustering. However, whereas relative precision was optimized with the most liberal condition to adapt, the ratio of final to initial sample size was best for more conservative CA values, indicating a tradeoff. In our simulations, precision and final sample size were both simultaneously favorable for disease incidence of up to 1.0%, but only when infected plants were most aggregated (V/M = 10).


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmood Arabkhedri ◽  
F. S. Lai ◽  
Noor-Akma Ibrahim ◽  
Mohamad-Roslan Mohamad-Kasim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document