A novel framework for class imbalance learning using intelligent under-sampling

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satuluri Naganjaneyulu ◽  
Mrithyumjaya Rao Kuppa
Keyword(s):  
Class Imbalance ◽  
Under Sampling ◽  
Imbalance Learning ◽  
Class Imbalance Learning

An Empirical Study of Boosting Methods on Severely Imbalanced Data

2014 ◽  
Vol 513-517 ◽  
pp. 2510-2513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Ying Liu
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Class Imbalance ◽  
Imbalanced Data ◽  
Real World Applications ◽  
Under Sampling ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Imbalance Learning ◽  
Class Imbalance Learning ◽  
F Measure

Nowadays there are large volumes of data in real-world applications, which poses great challenge to class-imbalance learning: the large amount of the majority class examples and severe class-imbalance. Previous studies on class-imbalance learning mainly focused on relatively small or moderate class-imbalance. In this paper we conduct an empirical study to explore the difference between learning with small or moderate class-imbalance and learning with severe class-imbalance. The experimental results show that: (1) Traditional methods cannot handle severe class-imbalance effectively. (2) AUC, G-mean and F-measure can be very inconsistent for severe class-imbalance, which seldom appears when class-imbalance is moderate. And G-mean is not appropriate for severe class-imbalance learning because it is not sensitive to the change of imbalance ratio. (3) When AUC and G-mean are evaluation metrics, EasyEnsemble is the best method, followed by BalanceCascade and under-sampling. (4) A little under-full balance is better for under-sampling to handle severe class-imbalance. And it is important to handle false positives when design methods for severe class-imbalance.

Class Imbalance Learning to Heterogeneous Cross Software Projects Defect Prediction

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Keyword(s):  
Research Work ◽  
Class Imbalance ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Software Projects ◽  
Class Imbalance Problem ◽  
Software Application ◽  
Imbalance Problem ◽  
Under Sampling ◽  
Imbalance Learning ◽  
Class Imbalance Learning

Heterogeneous CPDP (HCPDP) attempts to forecast defects in a software application having insufficient previous defect data. Nonetheless, with a Class Imbalance Problem (CIP) perspective, one should have a clear view of data distribution in the training dataset otherwise the trained model would lead to biased classification results. Class Imbalance Learning (CIL) is the method of achieving an equilibrium ratio between two classes in imbalanced datasets. There are a range of effective solutions to manage CIP such as resampling techniques like Over-Sampling (OS) & Under-Sampling (US) methods. The proposed research work employs Synthetic Minority Oversampling TEchnique (SMOTE) and Random Under Sampling (RUS) technique to handle CIP. In addition to this, the paper proposes a novel four-phase HCPDP model and contrasts the efficiency of basic HCPDP model with CIP and after handling CIP using SMOTE & RUS with three prediction pairs. Results show that training performance with SMOTE is substantially improved but RUS displays variations in relation to HCPDP for all three prediction pairs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document