Improving Behavior Analysts’ Public Speaking: Recommendations From Expert Interviews

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan R. Heinicke ◽  
Jessica F. Juanico ◽  
Amber L. Valentino ◽  
Tyra P. Sellers
Keyword(s):  
Public Speaking ◽  
Expert Interviews ◽  
Behavior Analysts

scholarly journals Behavior Analysts to the Front! A 15-Step Tutorial on Public Speaking

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick C. Friman
Keyword(s):  
Public Speaking ◽  
Behavior Analysts

Aerodynamic and Acoustic Voice Measures Before and After an Acute Public Speaking Stressor

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
pp. 3311-3325
Author(s):  
Brittany L. Perrine ◽  
Ronald C. Scherer
Keyword(s):  
Fundamental Frequency ◽  
Salivary Cortisol ◽  
Public Speaking ◽  
Stress System ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Subglottal Pressure ◽  
Response To Stress ◽  
System Activation ◽  
Speaking Fundamental Frequency ◽  
Pituitary Adrenal Axis

Purpose The goal of this study was to determine if differences in stress system activation lead to changes in speaking fundamental frequency, average oral airflow, and estimated subglottal pressure before and after an acute, psychosocial stressor. Method Eighteen vocally healthy adult females experienced the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) to activate the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. The TSST includes public speaking and performing mental arithmetic in front of an audience. At seven time points, three before the stressor and four after the stressor, the participants produced /pa/ repetitions, read the Rainbow Passage, and provided a saliva sample. Measures included (a) salivary cortisol level, (b) oral airflow, (c) estimated subglottal pressure, and (d) speaking fundamental frequency from the second sentence of the Rainbow Passage. Results Ten of the 18 participants experienced a hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis response to stress as indicated by a 2.5-nmol/L increase in salivary cortisol from before the TSST to after the TSST. Those who experienced a response to stress had a significantly higher speaking fundamental frequency before and immediately after the stressor than later after the stressor. No other variable varied significantly due to the stressor. Conclusions This study suggests that the idiosyncratic and inconsistent voice changes reported in the literature may be explained by differences in stress system activation. In addition, laryngeal aerodynamic measures appear resilient to changes due to acute stress. Further work is needed to examine the influence of other stress systems and if these findings hold for dysphonic individuals.

Music for Behavior Analysts

1976 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 594-595
Author(s):  
JOSEPH E. SPRADLIN
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Analysts
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document