Abstract
Purpose
Visceral artery aneurysms are subdivided into true aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. Visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPAs) are uncommon in clinical practice but may have serious clinical outcomes up to death. Endovascular management is a safe effective alternative option to traditional surgical procedures. This study assesses the outcome of different embolic materials and techniques used in the endovascular management of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms.
Materials and methods
This is a multicentric prospective analysis of endovascular embolisation of 46 VAPAs with a mean pseudoaneurysm size of 13 ± 11.35 mm. Management using coils only was done in 28/46 patients (60.87%), NBCA glue only in 16/46 patients (34.78%), combined coils and NBCA glue in 1/46 patient (2.17%), and Amplatzer plugs only in 1 patient (2.17%). The management techniques were sac packing in 9/46 patients (19.57%), inflow occlusion in 28/46 patients (60.87%) and trapping in 9/46 patients (19.57%).
Results
The overall clinical success rate was 93.48%, the overall perioperative complication rate was 15.22% and 30-day mortality was zero. For the coil subgroup (n = 28), the clinical success was 92.86%, while the subgroup of NBCA glue (n = 16) showed clinical success of 93.75%. There was no significant statistical difference between clinical success among coil, and NBCA glue subgroups (P > 0.05). The technical success rate was 100%. Effectiveness of the procedures during the follow-up was 97.83%. Target lesion re-intervention rate was 2.17%.
Conclusion
Transarterial embolisation can provide high technical and clinical success rates with low perioperative complication and re-intervention rates, as well as satisfactory procedure effectiveness in the management of VAPAs.
The Aftermath of a Hepatic Artery Aneurysm—A Rare Etiology of Biliary Obstruction!
