Muscle responses after transcranial magnetic cortex stimulation: Variability of latency of single motor units

1990 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. S76-S77
Author(s):  
E. Kunesh ◽  
B.-U. Meyer ◽  
R. Benecke ◽  
H.-J. Freund
2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 1685-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Dakin ◽  
Brian H. Dalton ◽  
Billy L. Luu ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Blouin

Rectification of surface electromyographic (EMG) recordings prior to their correlation with other signals is a widely used form of preprocessing. Recently this practice has come into question, elevating the subject of EMG rectification to a topic of much debate. Proponents for rectifying suggest it accentuates the EMG spike timing information, whereas opponents indicate it is unnecessary and its nonlinear distortion of data is potentially destructive. Here we examine the necessity of rectification on the extraction of muscle responses, but for the first time using a known oscillatory input to the muscle in the form of electrical vestibular stimulation. Participants were exposed to sinusoidal vestibular stimuli while surface and intramuscular EMG were recorded from the left medial gastrocnemius. We compared the unrectified and rectified surface EMG to single motor units to determine which method best identified stimulus-EMG coherence and phase at the single-motor unit level. Surface EMG modulation at the stimulus frequency was obvious in the unrectified surface EMG. However, this modulation was not identified by the fast Fourier transform, and therefore stimulus coherence with the unrectified EMG signal failed to capture this covariance. Both the rectified surface EMG and single motor units displayed significant coherence over the entire stimulus bandwidth (1–20 Hz). Furthermore, the stimulus-phase relationship for the rectified EMG and motor units shared a moderate correlation ( r = 0.56). These data indicate that rectification of surface EMG is a necessary step to extract EMG envelope modulation due to motor unit entrainment to a known stimulus.


Author(s):  
Yalda Nozad Mojaver ◽  
Paul Tawadros ◽  
Polyana Moura Ferreira ◽  
Terry Whittle ◽  
Greg M. Murray

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 751-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Phanachet ◽  
T. Whittle ◽  
K. Wanigaratne ◽  
G. M. Murray

The precise function of the inferior head of the human lateral pterygoid muscle (IHLP) is unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the normal function of the IHLP. The hypothesis was that an important function of the IHLP is the generation and fine control of horizontal (i.e., anteroposterior and mediolateral) jaw movements. The activities of 50 single motor units (SMUs) were recorded from IHLP (14 subjects) during two- or three-step contralateral movement ( n = 36) and/or protrusion ( n = 33). Most recording sites were identified by computer tomography. There was a statistically significant overall increase in firing rate as the magnitude of jaw displacement increased between the holding phases (range of increments: 0.3–1.6 mm). The firing rates during the dynamic phases for each unit were significantly greater than those during the previous holding phases but less than those during the subsequent holding phases. For the contralateral step task at the intermediate rate, the cross-correlation coefficients between jaw displacement in the mediolateral axis and the mean firing rate of each unit ranged from r = 0.29 to 0.77; mean ± SD; r = 0.49 ± 0.13 (protrusive step task: r = 0.12–0.74, r = 0.44 ± 0.14 for correlation with anterior–posterior axis). The correlation coefficients at the fast rate during the contralateral step task and the protrusive step task were significantly higher than those at the slow rate. The firing rate change of the SMUs per unit displacement between holding phases was significantly greater for the lower-threshold than for the higher-threshold units during contralateral movement and protrusion. After dividing IHLP into four regions, the SMUs recorded in the superior part exhibited significantly greater mean firing rate changes per unit displacement during protrusion than for the SMUs recorded in the inferior part. Significantly fewer units were related to the protrusive task in the superior–medial part. These data support previously proposed notions of functional heterogeneity within IHLP. The present findings provide further evidence for an involvement of the IHLP in the generation and fine control of horizontal jaw movements.


Pain ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Svensson ◽  
Anne S. McMillan ◽  
Thomas Graven-Nielsen ◽  
Kelun Wang ◽  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 1375-1384 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Aniss ◽  
S. C. Gandevia ◽  
D. Burke

1. Reflex responses were elicited in muscles that act at the ankle by electrical stimulation of low-threshold afferents from the foot in human subjects who were reclining supine. During steady voluntary contractions, stimulus trains (5 pulses at 300 Hz) were delivered at two intensities to the sural nerve (1.2-4.0 times sensory threshold) or to the posterior tibial nerve (1.1-3.0 times motor threshold for the intrinsic muscles of the foot). Electromyographic (EMG) recordings were made from tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL), soleus (SOL), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscles by the use of intramuscular wire electrodes. 2. As assessed by averages of rectified EMG, stimulation of the sural or posterior tibial nerves at nonpainful levels evoked a complex oscillation with onset latencies as early as 40 ms and lasting up to 200 ms in each muscle. The most common initial responses in TA were a decrease in EMG activity at an onset latency of 54 ms for sural stimuli, and an increase at an onset latency of 49 ms for posterior tibial stimuli. The response of PL to stimulation of the two nerves began with a strong facilitation of 44 ms (sural) and 49 ms (posterior tibial). With SOL, stimulation of both nerves produced early inhibition beginning at 45 and 50 ms, respectively. With both LG and MG, sural stimuli produced an early facilitation at 52-53 ms. However, posterior tibial stimuli produced different initial responses in these two muscles: facilitation in LG at 50 ms and inhibition in MG at 51 ms. 3. Perstimulus time histograms of the discharge of 61 single motor units revealed generally similar reflex responses as in multiunit EMG. However, different reflex components were not equally apparent in the responses of different single motor units: an individual motor unit could respond slightly differently with a change in stimulus intensity or background contraction level. The multiunit EMG record represents a global average that does not necessarily depict the precise pattern of all motor units contributing to the average. 4. When subjects stood erect without support and with eyes closed, reflex patterns were seen only in active muscles, and the patterns were similar to those in the reclining posture. 5. It is concluded that afferents from mechanoreceptors in the sole of the foot have multisynaptic reflex connections with the motoneuron pools innervating the muscles that act at the ankle. When the muscles are active in standing or walking, cutaneous feedback may play a role in modulating motoneuron output and thereby contribute to stabilization of stance and gait.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document