The stacking register - a simultaneous input/output buffer

1968 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Philokyprou ◽  
A. Zacharacopoulos
1997 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Tsirikos ◽  
K. G. Arvanitis

The disturbance rejection with simultaneous input-output linearization and decoupling problem of nonsquare nonlinear systems via restricted state feedback is investigated in this paper. The problem is treated on the basis of an algebraic approach whose main feature is that it reduces the determination of the admissible state feedback control laws to the solution of an algebraic and a first order partial differential systems of equations. Verifiable necessary and sufficient conditions of algebraic nature based on these systems of equations are established for the solvability of the aforementioned problem. Moreover, an explicit expression for a special admissible restricted state feedback controller is analytically derived. [S0022-0434(00)02101-8]


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yury N. Kulchin ◽  
Roman S. Drozdov ◽  
Igor V. Denisov ◽  
Victor A. Sedov

Author(s):  
A. Boyer ◽  
M. Fer ◽  
L. Courau ◽  
E. Sicard ◽  
S. BenDhia
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter FitzGerald ◽  
Andrew Tattersall ◽  
Donald Broadbent

Four experiments were performed, in each of which two sub-lists of items were presented for later recall, with varying priorities for success on each of the lists. All showed a trade-off, indicating that at some point the two lists were using the same mechanisms. In the two cases where presentation was simultaneous, however, the effects of priority interacted with those of recall order—that is, the items recalled first showed a larger effect of priority than did those recalled second. In the two cases where one sub-list arrived after the other, the low-priority items gave just as large an effect of recall order as the high-priority items. The second list presented did, however, show a larger effect of recall order than the first list presented. It is argued that the systems shared between two sublists involve some representations that are not disturbed by output, as well as an input—output buffer. The latter can hold a little extra information temporarily, but is disturbed by output; for successive lists it is dedicated largely to the most recently received list, but for simultaneous lists it is shared between the two lists in proportion to priority.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document