A feminist perspective on the study of home birth *1Application of a midwifery care framework

1994 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
S BORTIN ◽  
M ALZUGARAY ◽  
J DOWD ◽  
J KALMAN
2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-144
Author(s):  
Rachel Goldstein

Rachel Goldstein shares her experience of exploring options related to care provider and place of birth early in her pregnancy. Goldstein and her husband, Marc, after reading and research, chose midwifery care and a home birth. She shares the story of a long labor at home supported by her husband, her doula, and her midwife. Her positive attitude, her ability to use various comfort strategies, and the support she received throughout labor contributed to being able to give birth naturally and ecstatically to her son Jonah.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 186-189

A mother recalls the home birth of her first child. Her story exemplifies the power of birth when a mother is supported to listen to her body and labor on her own terms, and she praises the comfort of home birth and the respect of midwifery care. She emerges from the other side of her birth empowered and transformed, ready to embrace motherhood.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Fox ◽  
Athena Sheehan ◽  
Caroline Homer

Recent evidence supports the safety of planned home birth for low-risk women when professional midwifery care and adequate collaborative arrangements for referral and transfer are in place. The purpose of this article is to synthesize the qualitative literature on the experiences of women planning a home birth, who are subsequently transferred from home to hospital. A metasynthesis approach was selected because it aims to create a rich understanding of women’s experiences of transfer by synthesizing and interpreting qualitative data. Three categories were synthesized: “communication, connection, and continuity,” “making the transition,” and “making sense of events.” Quality and clarity of communication, feeling connected to the backup hospital, and continuity of midwifery carer helps make the transfer process as seamless as possible for women. Arriving at the hospital is a time of vulnerability and fear, and retaining the care of a known midwife is reassuring. New caregivers must also be sensitive to women’s need to be reassured and accepted. The reasons for transfer need to be clearly communicated both at the time of transfer and in more detail during the postpartum period. Women need to talk through their experience and to acknowledge their feelings of disappointment in order to move forward in the next phase of their lives. Continuity of carer enables this to be done by a known caregiver in a sensitive and individualized manner. Further qualitative research to examine home birth transfer issues, specifically in the Australian context, is currently being planned as part of the Birthplace in Australia project.


2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Z. Cockerham ◽  
Arlene W. Keeling

In 1944, the Medical Mission Sisters opened the Catholic Maternity Institute in Santa Fe, New Mexico, primarily to serve patients of Spanish American descent. The Maternity Institute offered nurse-midwifery care and functioned as a school to train nurse-midwifery students. Originally planned as a home birth service, the Catholic Maternity Institute soon evolved into a service in which patients chose whether to deliver in their own homes or in a small freestanding building called La Casita. In fact, despite their idealism about home birth and strong feelings that home birth was best, the sisters experienced significant ambivalence concerning La Casita. Births there met many of the institute’s pragmatic needs for a larger number of student experiences, quick and safe transfers to a nearby hospital, and more efficient use of the midwives’ time. Importantly, as the sisters realized that many of their patients preferred to deliver at La Casita, they came to see that this option permitted these impoverished patients an opportunity to exercise some choice. However, the choice of many patients to deliver at La Casita—which was significantly more expensive for the Maternity Institute than home birth—eventually led to the demise of the Maternity Institute.


2000 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-178
Author(s):  
Bernice Lott
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document