Intra-individual variability in infant visual recognition memory performance: Temperamental and environmental correlates

1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore D. Wachs ◽  
Judy Morrow ◽  
Elizabeth H. Slabach
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Visual Recognition ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Environmental Correlates ◽  
Visual Recognition Memory ◽  
Recognition Memory Performance

Effects of Combined and Separate Removals of Rostral Dorsal Superior Temporal Sulcus Cortex and Perirhinal Cortex on Visual Recognition Memory in Rhesus Monkeys

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 2419-2427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy S. Hadfield ◽  
Mark G. Baxter ◽  
Elisabeth A. Murray
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Visual Recognition ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Perirhinal Cortex ◽  
Superior Temporal Sulcus ◽  
Visual Recognition Memory ◽  
Recognition Memory Performance ◽  
Combined Lesions

The dorsal bank of the superior temporal sulcus (STSd) bears anatomical relations similar to those of perirhinal cortex, an area critical for visual recognition memory. To examine whether STSd makes a similar contribution to visual recognition memory, performance on visual delayed nonmatching-to-sample (DNMS) was assessed in rhesus monkeys with combined or separate ablations of the perirhinal cortex and STSd as well as in unoperated controls. Consistent with previous findings, ablations of perirhinal cortex produced deficits nearly as severe as that found after rhinal (i.e., entorhinal plus perirhinal) cortex lesions. However, combined lesions of perirhinal cortex and STSd produced a deficit no greater than that produced by perirhinal cortex ablation alone, and lesions of STSd alone were without effect on DNMS. We conclude that STSd is not critically involved in visual recognition memory.

Learning From (Test) Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan E. Mitton ◽  
Chris M. Fiacconi
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Judgments Of Learning ◽  
Visual Images ◽  
Memory Tests ◽  
Recognition Memory Performance ◽  
Study Test ◽  
Explicit Feedback

Abstract. To date there has been relatively little research within the domain of metamemory that examines how individuals monitor their performance during memory tests, and whether the outcome of such monitoring informs subsequent memory predictions for novel items. In the current study, we sought to determine whether spontaneous monitoring of test performance can in fact help individuals better appreciate their memory abilities, and in turn shape future judgments of learning (JOLs). Specifically, in two experiments we examined recognition memory for visual images across three study-test cycles, each of which contained novel images. We found that across cycles, participants’ JOLs did in fact increase, reflecting metacognitive sensitivity to near-perfect levels of recognition memory performance. This finding suggests that individuals can and do monitor their test performance in the absence of explicit feedback, and further underscores the important role that test experience can play in shaping metacognitive evaluations of learning and remembering.

Semantic Congruency Improves Recognition Memory Performance for Both Audiovisual and Visual Stimuli

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 763-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni Heikkilä ◽  
Kimmo Alho ◽  
Kaisa Tiippana
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Congruency Effect ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
The Other ◽  
Memory Encoding ◽  
Semantic Congruency ◽  
Recognition Memory Performance ◽  
Visual Encoding ◽  
Per Se

Audiovisual semantic congruency during memory encoding has been shown to facilitate later recognition memory performance. However, it is still unclear whether this improvement is due to multisensory semantic congruency or just semantic congruencyper se. We investigated whether dual visual encoding facilitates recognition memory in the same way as audiovisual encoding. The participants memorized auditory or visual stimuli paired with a semantically congruent, incongruent or non-semantic stimulus in the same modality or in the other modality during encoding. Subsequent recognition memory performance was better when the stimulus was initially paired with a semantically congruent stimulus than when it was paired with a non-semantic stimulus. This congruency effect was observed with both audiovisual and dual visual stimuli. The present results indicate that not only multisensory but also unisensory semantically congruent stimuli can improve memory performance. Thus, the semantic congruency effect is not solely a multisensory phenomenon, as has been suggested previously.

Neurotoxic lesions of perirhinal cortex impair visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys

Neuroreport ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1913-1917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludisue M??lkov?? ◽  
Jocelyne Bachevalier ◽  
Mortimer Mishkin ◽  
Richard C. Saunders
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Visual Recognition ◽  
Perirhinal Cortex ◽  
Visual Recognition Memory ◽  
Neurotoxic Lesions
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document