The role of vertical disparity in depth perception

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
A. Kunigelis
i-Perception ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 204166951668130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Vienne ◽  
Justin Plantier ◽  
Pascaline Neveu ◽  
Anne-Emmanuelle Priot

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aki Tsuruhara ◽  
Hirohiko Kaneko ◽  
So Kanazawa ◽  
Yumiko Otsuka ◽  
Nobu Shirai ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nestor Matthews ◽  
Xin Meng ◽  
Peng Xu ◽  
Ning Qian

Vision ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Elizaveta Mischenko ◽  
Ippei Negishi ◽  
Elena S. Gorbunova ◽  
Tadamasa Sawada

Bishop Berkeley suggested that the distance of an object can be estimated if the object’s size is familiar to the observer. It has been suggested that humans can perceive the distance of the object by using such “familiarity” information, but most or many of the prior experiments that found an effect of familiarity were not designed to minimize or eliminate potential influences of: higher cognitive factors on the observers’ responses, or the influences of low-level image features in the visual stimuli used. We looked for the familiarity effect in two experiments conducted both in Russia and Japan. The visual stimuli used were images of three coins used in Russia and Japan. The participants’ depth perception was measured with a multiple-choice task testing the perceived depth-order of the coins. Our expectation was that any effect of “familiarity” on depth perception would only be observed with the coins of the participant’s country. We expected a substantial familiarity effect based on our meta-analysis of the “familiarity” effects observed in prior experiments. But, our results in both experiments showed that the familiarity effect was virtually zero. These findings suggest that the importance of a familiarity effect in depth perception should be reconsidered.


Perception ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 985-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Predebon

The role of the familiar-size cue to distance in stereoscopic depth perception was examined in two experiments. In experiment 1 subjects judged the depth of a binocularly viewed interval, the far point of which was defined by either a familiar or an unfamiliar object, and in experiment 2 subjects adjusted the depth of the interval so that its extent appeared equal to the length of a vertical reference extent positioned on the surface of the object. Although familiar size influenced depth estimates (experiment 1) it did not influence matching judgments (experiment 2). The findings are discussed with reference to the issue of the nature of the familiar-size effects on judgments of stereoscopic depth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document