Infants’ sensitivity to vertical disparity for depth perception

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aki Tsuruhara ◽  
Hirohiko Kaneko ◽  
So Kanazawa ◽  
Yumiko Otsuka ◽  
Nobu Shirai ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nestor Matthews ◽  
Xin Meng ◽  
Peng Xu ◽  
Ning Qian

Perception ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Liu ◽  
Scott B Stevenson ◽  
Clifton M Schor

We have observed quantitative depth perception with a dichoptic stimulus which possessed no contrast-defined binocular corresponding features (phantom stereogram). The depth perception can be the result of appreciation of a partial-occlusion situation depicted by the stimulus, or the result of activities of low-level disparity detectors which are capable of combining dissimilar local features in the stimulus. Although both mechanisms predict similar depth perception, they predict different vergence eye-movement outputs, especially in the vertical dimension. To identify the underlying mechanisms of the phantom stereopsis, we recorded vergence tracking eye movements to four types of dichoptic stimuli: (a) conventional stereogram with horizontal disparity (HD); (b) horizontal phantom stereogram (HP); (c) conventional stereogram with vertical disparity (VD); and (d) vertical phantom stereogram (VP). We found that HD, HP, and VD stimuli could elicit robust vergence tracking eye movements but VP stimulus could not. While the success of HP stimulus in eliciting vergence tracking may be explained by proximal vergence, the failure of VP stimulus in eliciting vergence tracking clearly indicates that phantom stereogram could not elicit coherent responses among low-level disparity detectors. Partial occlusion, therefore, has to play an important role in the depth perception from the phantom stereogram.


i-Perception ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 204166951668130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Vienne ◽  
Justin Plantier ◽  
Pascaline Neveu ◽  
Anne-Emmanuelle Priot

Author(s):  
John W. Akers ◽  
Elizabeth T. Davis ◽  
Robert A. King

We tested the effect of direction of retinal disparity and stimulus orientation on stereoscopic depth perception to answer three questions. First, are some directions of disparity more efficient than others in providing stereoscopic depth information? Second, does the orientation of an object affect perceived stereoscopic depth? Third, are there any interactions between these parameters? Subjects were tested using a psychophysical, method of constant stimuli procedure with a modified Wheatstone stereoscopic display. Disparity threshold measurements show a significant effect of direction of retinal disparity. Contrary to expectations however, no significant effect of orientation was found if vertical retinal disparities were excluded from the analyses. Stereoacuity thresholds were measurable with obliquely-oriented stimuli and vertical disparity, however, suggesting that vertical disparities can provide useful information. The implications of these results for the graphics, calibration, and design of stereoscopic displays (e.g., HMDs) are discussed.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny C. A. Read ◽  
Bruce G. Cumming

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document