Skeletal stability after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

1991 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-104
Author(s):  
G.W. Hueler
2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Snehlata Oberoi ◽  
Radhika Chigurupati ◽  
Karin Vargervik

Objective: To delineate factors that may contribute to maxillary hypoplasia requiring maxillary advancement surgery in individuals with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal study used lateral cephalometric radiographs and chart reviews of 16 nonsyndromic UCLP individuals who underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement and 16 controls matched for cleft type, age, and gender. Cephalometric measurements were made at three time points (T1, T2, and T3): mean ages of 10.7, 13.3, and 15.8 years for the Le Fort group and 10.11, 12.9, and 15.7 years, respectively, for the control group. Information regarding team care, timing and number of surgical procedures, and number of congenitally missing teeth were determined from clinical records. Results: The Le Fort group had significant maxillary hypoplasia at all time points compared to the UCLP controls, indicated by midface length measurements, ANB and Wit's analysis ( p < .001). The Le Fort group had twice the number of palatal surgical procedures and number of missing teeth in the maxillary arch as compared with the cleft controls. Most of the control group had consistent team care, while most of the surgical group did not. Conclusions: Maxillary hypoplasia that will require a Le Fort I advancement can be determined as early as age 10. Multiple missing maxillary teeth, secondary palate procedures including pharyngeal flaps, and inconsistent team care with delayed orthodontic intervention are contributing factors to maxillary underdevelopment.


2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnulf Baumann ◽  
Klaus Sinko

Objective Assessment of stability of the advanced maxilla after two-jaw surgery and Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft palate based on soft tissue planning. Subjects Between 1995 and 1998, 15 patients with cleft lip and palate deformities underwent advancement of a retruded maxilla, without insertion of additional bone grafts. Eleven patients had bimaxillary osteotomies and four patients only a Le Fort I osteotomy. Relapse of the maxilla in horizontal and vertical dimensions was evaluated by cephalometric analysis after a clinical follow-up of at least 2 years. Results In the bimaxillary osteotomies, horizontal advancement was an average 4 mm at point A. After 2 years, there was an additional advancement of point A of an average of 0.7 mm. In the mandible, a relapse of 0.8 mm was seen after an average setback of 3.9 mm. In the four patients with Le Fort I osteotomy, point A was advanced by 3.8 mm and the relapse after 2 years was 0.9 mm. Vertical elongation at point A resulted in relapse in both groups. Impaction of the maxilla led to further impaction as well. Conclusion Cephalometric soft tissue analysis demonstrates the need for a two-jaw surgery, not only in severe maxillary hypoplasia. Alteration of soft tissue to functional harmony and three-dimensional correction of the maxillomandibular complex are easier to perform in a two-jaw procedure. It results in a more stable horizontal skeletal position of the maxilla.


Author(s):  
Bibiana Dalsasso Velasques ◽  
Lucas Borin Moura ◽  
João Roig Martins ◽  
Melissa Feres Damian ◽  
Cristina Braga Xavier

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document