Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks

1985 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick T.W Hudson ◽  
Marijke W Bergman
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Lexical Decision ◽  
Word Frequency ◽  
Word Length ◽  
Lexical Knowledge ◽  
Lexical Decision Tasks ◽  
Decision Tasks

scholarly journals Word length effects for kana and kanji words in lexical decision tasks

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-115
Author(s):  
Yuu KUSUNOSE ◽  
Masahiro YOSHIHARA ◽  
Keisuke IDA ◽  
Junyi XUE ◽  
Mutsuo IJUIN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lexical Decision ◽  
Word Length ◽  
Lexical Decision Tasks ◽  
Length Effects ◽  
Decision Tasks

CHRONOMETRY OF VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION DURING PASSIVE AND LEXICAL DECISION TASKS: AN ERP INVESTIGATION

2004 ◽  
Vol 114 (11) ◽  
pp. 1401-1432 ◽  
Author(s):  
GRÉGORY SIMON ◽  
CHRISTIAN BERNARD ◽  
PIERRE LARGY ◽  
ROBERT LALONDE ◽  
MOHAMED REBAI
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Lexical Decision ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Lexical Decision Tasks ◽  
Decision Tasks

scholarly journals Word Length Effects for Kanji Words in Lexical Decision Tasks

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (0) ◽  
pp. 2PM-014-2PM-014
Author(s):  
Yuu KUSUNOSE ◽  
Masahiro YOSHIHARA ◽  
Keisuke IDA ◽  
Junyi XUE ◽  
Mutsuo IJUIN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lexical Decision ◽  
Word Length ◽  
Lexical Decision Tasks ◽  
Length Effects ◽  
Decision Tasks

The Interaction of Word Frequency and Stimulus Quality in the Lexical Decision Task: Now you See It, Now you Don't

1988 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 757-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Wilding
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Lexical Decision ◽  
Lexical Decision Task ◽  
Word Frequency ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
Stimulus Quality ◽  
Joint Effects ◽  
Two Factors

Two experiments are reported that examined the joint effects of word frequency and stimulus quality in the context of a lexical decision task. In the first experiment the interval between response to a stimulus and onset of the next stimulus was 0.8 sec, and the effect of the two factors was additive. In the second this interval was 3.3 sec, and the effect of reducing stimulus quality was greater for infrequent words than for frequent words. This is similar to the result of Norris (1984). The inability of current models of word recognition to explain this finding is discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document