Critical temperature and upper critical field of superconductors for different Fermi surface models

1989 ◽  
Vol 162-164 ◽  
pp. 801-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Pint ◽  
M. Prohammer ◽  
E. Schachinger
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabyasachi Paul ◽  
S. K. Ramjan ◽  
L. S. Sharath Chandra ◽  
Archna Sagdeo ◽  
M. K. Chattopadhyay

2017 ◽  
Vol 255-256 ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. Castro ◽  
O. Olicón ◽  
R. Escamilla ◽  
F. Morales

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sourin Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Goutam Sheet ◽  
A. K. Nigam ◽  
Pratap Raychaudhuri ◽  
H. Takeya

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Matera ◽  
M. Bonura ◽  
R. Černý ◽  
S. McKeown Walker ◽  
F. Buta ◽  
...  

Abstract The upper critical field sets the thermodynamic limit to superconductivity. A big gap is present between the upper-critical-field values measured in MgB2 polycrystalline bulk superconductors and those of thin films, where values as high as ~ 50 T have been achieved at 4.2 K. Filling this gap would unlock the potential of MgB2 for magnet applications. This work presents the results of an extensive experimental campaign on MgB2 bulk samples, which has been guided by a Design of Experiment. We modeled the dependence of the upper critical field on the main synthesis parameters and established a new record (~ 35 T at 4.2 K) preparing C-doped bulk samples by a non-conventional rapid-synthesis route. This value appears to be an upper boundary for the upper critical field in bulk samples. Structural disorder in films seems to act selectively on one of the two bands where superconductivity in MgB2 takes place: this enhances the upper critical field while reducing the critical temperature only by few Kelvins. On the other hand, the critical temperature in bulk samples decreases monotonically when structural disorder increases, and this imposes a limit to the maximum achievable upper critical field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document