Cortical columns

Author(s):  
Zoltán Molnár ◽  
Kathleen S. Rockland
Keyword(s):  
1980 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-501
Author(s):  
Kao Liang Chow
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Stoop ◽  
Victor Saase ◽  
Clemens Wagner ◽  
Britta Stoop ◽  
Ruedi Stoop

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Rawji ◽  
Matteo Ciocca ◽  
Andre Zacharia ◽  
David Soares ◽  
Dennis Truong ◽  
...  

Measurements and models of current flow in the brain during transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) indicate stimulation of regions in-between electrodes. Moreover, the cephalic cortex result in local fluctuations in current flow intensity and direction, and animal studies suggest current flow direction relative to cortical columns determines response to tDCS. Here we test this idea by measuring changes in cortico-spinal excitability by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Evoked Potentials (TMS-MEP), following tDCS applied with electrodes aligned orthogonal (across) or parallel to M1 in the central sulcus. Current flow models predicted that the orthogonal electrode montage produces consistently oriented current across the hand region of M1 that flows along cortical columns, while the parallel electrode montage produces none-uniform current directions across the M1 cortical surface. We find that orthogonal, but not parallel, orientated tDCS modulates TMS-MEPs. We also show modulation is sensitive to the orientation of the TMS coil (PA or AP), which is through to select different afferent pathways to M1. Our results are consistent with tDCS producing directionally specific neuromodulation in brain regions in-between electrodes, but shows nuanced changes in excitability that are presumably current direction relative to column and axon pathway specific. We suggest that the direction of current flow through cortical target regions should be considered for targeting and dose-control of tDCS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document