Design of clinical development programs

2022 ◽  
pp. 653-679
Author(s):  
Megan A. Gibbs ◽  
Bengt Hamren ◽  
David W. Boulton ◽  
Helen Tomkinson ◽  
Renee Iacona
2005 ◽  
pp. 249-261
Author(s):  
William Trepicchio ◽  
Monica Cahilly ◽  
Lisa Speicher ◽  
Judith Oestreicher ◽  
Michael Burczynski ◽  
...  

Drug Safety ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subrata Ghosh ◽  
Lianne S. Gensler ◽  
Zijiang Yang ◽  
Chris Gasink ◽  
Soumya D. Chakravarty ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Orfali ◽  
L Feldman ◽  
V Bhattacharjee ◽  
P Harkins ◽  
S Kadam ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 340-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Papp ◽  
Marc Bourcier ◽  
Vincent Ho ◽  
Karen Burke ◽  
Boulos Haraoui

Background: Patents on several biologies will expire in Canada in the coming years. As they expire, applications to market subsequent entry biologies (SEBs) may be filed in Canada. Objective: To provide an understanding of the regulatory pathway and types of trials used for SEB authorization in Canada. Methods: Health Canada's draft guidance on SEBs was reviewed in regards to key issues and challenges in the development and authorization of SEBs. Results: Health Canada states that SEBs are not “generic biologies” and their authorization is not a declaration of pharmaceutical or therapeutic equivalence to the originator. The agency recommends that physicians make well-informed decisions regarding therapeutic interchange. Conclusions: Decisions on how to determine the place of SEBs in clinical practice for biologic-naive patients and those already receiving biologies should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the patient's needs, the characteristics of the biologic required, and the clinical development programs of the applicable SEB.


Drug Safety ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 809-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subrata Ghosh ◽  
Lianne S. Gensler ◽  
Zijiang Yang ◽  
Chris Gasink ◽  
Soumya D. Chakravarty ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document