Scoliosis Correction

Author(s):  
Daniel J. Hedequist
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1028-1036
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Gal ◽  
Christopher J. Curatolo ◽  
Jeron Zerillo ◽  
Bryan Hill ◽  
Baron Lonner ◽  
...  

Folia Medica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Mikhaylovskiy ◽  
Vyacheslav Stupak ◽  
Vadim Belozerov ◽  
Nikolay Fomichev ◽  
Anatoliy Lutsik ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The rate of scoliosis in syringomyelia patients ranges from 25 to 74.4%. In turn, syringomyelia occurs in 1.2% to 9.7% of scoliosis patients. Aim: To evaluate outcomes of surgical correction of the scoliotic deformity in syringomyelia patients. Materials and methods: Between 1996 and 2015, 3120 patients with scoliosis of various etiologies were treated at the Clinic for Child and Adolescent Vertebrology of the Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics. We conducted a retrospective analysis of syringomyelia-associated scoliosis cases that required surgical correction. Results: Syringomyelia was found in 33 patients (1.05%) out of 3120 patients with spinal deformities of various etiologies; in 21 patients (0.9%) with idiopathic scoliosis of 2334 patients. In identifying the neurological deficit, the recommended first step is to perform neurosurgery. Nineteen patients were operated using the CDI, 4 patients underwent correction VEPTR, in 1 case instrumentation could not be established, 9 patients are undergoing treatment in the department of neurosurgery at the moment. Worsening of neurological deficits was not observed in any patient. Conclusion: A comparison of the results of syringomyelia-associated scoliosis correction with the data of other authors was done. The choice of surgery tactics is strictly individual and depends on the size of the cavity. The result of surgical intervention is generally positive and the loss of correction by the end of follow-up is negligible.


1991 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 721-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
George T. Wynarsky ◽  
Albert B. Schultz
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100165
Author(s):  
Christopher Antonacci ◽  
M. Darryl Antonacci ◽  
William P. Bassett ◽  
Laury A. Cuddihy ◽  
Allison R. Haas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omat Rachmat ◽  
◽  
Dohar AL Tobing ◽  
Rr. Nur Fauziyah ◽  
Jenifer Kiem Aviani ◽  
...  

Iatrogenic spinal injury resulting in paraplegia or paraparesis after surgical correction of scoliosis deformity is a rare complication but is very detrimental to the patient. Intraoperative Neuromonitoring (IOM) has become the gold standard to monitor surgical procedures which has potential risks to damage the spinal cord. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the role of IOM in predicting the severity and extent of neurological injury during and after spinal correction surgery in adult idiopathic scoliosis cases related to surgical variables. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central Hospital, Fatmawati Central Hospital, and dr. Drajat Prawiranegara General Hospital during the period of 20 March 2018 to 20 August 2019. The primary outcomes were intraoperative monitoring status and post-operative neurological deficits status. Confounder data on scoliosis correction degree, intraoperative hemorrhage, and type of anesthesia used during surgery were retrieved. Chi-Square statistic was used in the analysis. Out of the ninety three patients eligible for this study, twenty two patients was detected as positive in IOM assessment. Four of the patients were found to be positive for post-operative neuromuscular defect. Thereby it can be concluded that IOM procedure can effectively prevent neurological deficits post-surgery with 81.8% specificity and 95.7% sensitivity among thosepositively detected by IOM. Some of the factors that could potentially influence false positive IOM results such as anesthetic used; dosage and administration procedures; magnitude of the scoliosis correction angle; and amount of bleeding during surgery have to be carefully analyzed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Seung-gyu Jeon ◽  
Byung Hoon Yoo ◽  
Yun-Hee Lim ◽  
Sangseok Lee ◽  
Ki Hyuk Hong

1997 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.G. Veldhuizen ◽  
M.M. Sanders ◽  
J.C. Cool
Keyword(s):  

Spine ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (26) ◽  
pp. E832-E836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amer F. Samdani ◽  
JahanGir Asghar ◽  
Joshua Pahys ◽  
Linda D’Andrea ◽  
Randal R. Betz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document