Spinal deformities: Evidence and patient safety in management

No abstract available.

Evaluation of parallel endplate osteotomy for severe rigid spinal deformities: a retrospective analysis of 36 cases with a minimum 2-year follow-up

Background To report on the technique and results of parallel endplate osteotomy (PEO) for severe rigid spinal deformity. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 36 patients with severe rigid spinal deformities who underwent PEO between July 2016 and December 2018 and who were followed up for at least 24 months. Results Following PEO, the kyphosis and scoliosis correction rates reached 77.4 ± 14.0% and 72.2 ± 18.2%, respectively. The median intraoperative estimated blood loss was 1500 mL and the median operative time was 6.8 h. The SF-36 scores of physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social function, role-emotional and mental health changed from 62 ± 28, 51 ± 26, 49 ± 29, 35 ± 30, 53 ± 28, 45 ± 30, 32 ± 34 and 54 ± 18 at baseline to 81 ± 16, 66 ± 41, 72 ± 40, 64 ± 44, 75 ± 25, 71 ± 46, 66 ± 34 and 76 ± 28 at 12 months postoperatively, 82 ± 32, 67 ± 42, 81 ± 30, 71 ± 41, 80 ± 30, 74 ± 36, 68 ± 35 and 85 ± 33 at 18 months postoperatively, and 86 ± 21, 83 ± 33, 88 ± 26, 79 ± 39, 86 ± 36, 86 ± 48, 80 ± 47 and 91 ± 39 at 24 months postoperatively, respectively. Conclusions PEO is an effective technique for successful correction of spinal deformities. At the two-year follow-up visit, all patients achieved better clinical results based on the SF-36 scores.

P097 Diagnostic dilemma of acquired non-traumatic spinal deformation: Pott's disease; histiocytosis or psoriatic rheumatism? About a case

Background Non-traumatic acquired spinal deformities represent a separate entity within the axial pathologies in children. Their causes are variable (neurological, muscular, infectious, especially Pott's disease, inflammatory or tumoral). The etiological diagnosis can be clinically oriented by pain, medical history, especially rheumatic. The contribution of the CT scan is crucial, as it localizes the lesion, specifies its nature, but above all it helps the histological diagnosis by guided biopsies. Our case illustrates the difficulties in diagnosing the aetiology of spinal acquired deformity in a girl with a multi-evocative context. Observation A 14 years-old girl complains for a few months of a dorso-lumbar spinal pain and a vicious attitude. Her medical history includes femoral thrombophlebitis and psoriasis. She had no trauma or fever. Clinically, the general state is preserved, with no local inflammatory signs, a kyphotic attitude with an analgesic lumbar support was noted. The rest of the locomotor exam was normal. CT scan shows cancellous body geodes with a double mirror. Discussion Acquired spinal deformities are always secondary to general disease. The fever may point to bacterial infections, especially tuberculosis (Pott's disease), but also non-infectious causes such as a rheumatic disease. For our patient, psoriasis argues for the latter possibility. However, the rarity of isolated disco-vertebral involvement and the severity of the lytic lesions are against this diagnosis. The histopathological exam showed an eosinophilic granuloma, confirming the histiocytosis X diagnosis. The cortico-response strengthen the diagnosis. The course was marked by the bone remodeling with the posture correction. Conclusion A clinical, radiological, and histological analysis allow the etiological orientation in front of acquired spinal deformity.

The role of femoral obliquity angle and T1 pelvic angle in predicting quality of life after spinal surgery in adult spinal deformities

Background Adult spinal deformities (ASD) represent a growing clinical condition related to chronic pain, disability and reduction in quality of life (QoL). A strong correlation among spinal alignment, spinopelvic parameters and QoL after spinal fusion surgery in ASD patients was thoroughly investigated over the last decade, However, only few studies focused on the relationship between lumbo-pelvic-femoral parameters - such as Femoral Obliquity Angle (FOA), T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA) and QoL. Methods Radiological and clinical data from 43 patients surgically treated with thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion for ASD between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were the correlation between preoperative spino-pelvic-femoral parameters and postoperative clinical, functional outcomes and QoL. Secondary outcomes were: changes in sagittal radiographic parameters spino-pelvic-femoral, clinical and functional outcomes and the rate of complications after surgery. Results Using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, spinopelvic femoral parameters (FOA, TPA, pre and post-operative) are directly statistically correlated to the quality of life (ODI, SRS-22, pre and post-operative; > 0,6 strong correlation, p < 0.05). Stratifying the patients according pre preoperative FOA value (High FOA ≥ 10 and Normal/Low FOA < 10), those belonging to the first group showed worse clinical (VAS: 5.2 +/− 1.4 vs 2.9 +/− 0.8) and functional outcomes (ODI: 35.6+/− 6.8 vs 23.2 +/− 6.5) after 2 years of follow-up and a greater number of mechanical complications (57.9% vs 8.3% p < 0.0021). Conclusion Based on our results, preoperative FOA and TPA could be important prognostic parameters for predicting disability and quality of life after spinal surgery in ASD patients and early indicators of possible spinal sagittal malalignment. FOA and TPA, like other and better known spinopelvic parameters, should always be considered when planning corrective surgery in ASD patients.

Use of vision-based augmented reality to improve student learning of the spine and spinal deformities. An exploratory study

Background: Knowledge of anatomy and pathology of the spine together with spinal deformities is integral to several healthcare disciplines. This knowledge is crucial for graduates for assessment and management of patients with spinal problems. Physiotherapy students generally find it difficult to conceptualise the integrity of the structure and function of the spine that affects their acquisition of related physiotherapy skills.Objective: Our first objective was to introduce and evaluate the use of a Vision-Based Augmented Reality (VBAR) mobile application to teach students the anatomy and accessory movements of the spine. A further objective was to explore student experiences of and engagement with VBAR by conducting a post-lecture survey comparing VBAR to traditional teaching.Methods: This post-intervention crossover design study included two groups: final year physiotherapy students (n = 74) and mean age of 23 (±1.8). The computing department at Teesside University developed the VBAR mobile application. Moreover, a survey adapted from a previously published article was disseminated to students to evaluate their level of understanding following the use of the VBAR application.Results: The results demonstrated that the median questionnaire scores in students’ perceived level of understanding for the VBAR group were significantly higher than for the traditional teaching group (p 0.05).Conclusion: The results of this post-intervention survey suggest that the integration of VBAR learning activities results in gains relating to students’ understanding of spinal anatomy, function, pathology and deformities. These findings suggest that VBAR could be an additional teaching tool to support student learning.Clinical implications: Greater understanding is expected to increase the quality of clinical practice.

Is there an indication for surgery in patients with spinal deformities? – A critical appraisal

Background: High-quality evidence exists to support physiotherapy and brace treatment for scoliosis and other spinal deformities. However, according to previous systematic reviews, it seems that no evidence exists for surgery. Nevertheless, the number of research articles focussing on spinal surgery highly exceeds the number of articles focussing on conservative treatment.Objective: The purpose of this study is to conduct an updated search for systematic reviews providing high-quality evidence for spinal surgery in patients with spinal deformities.Method: A narrative review including PubMed and the Cochrane database was conducted on April 12, 2020, with the following search terms: (1) spinal deformities, surgery, systematic review and outcome; (2) kyphosis, surgery, systematic review and outcome; (3) Scheuermann’s disease, surgery, systematic review and outcome, and (4) scoliosis, surgery, systematic review and outcome.Results: No reviews containing prospective controlled or randomised controlled studies were found providing evidence for surgery.Conclusions: A general indication for spine surgery just based on the Cobb angle is not given. In view of the long-term unknown variables and the possible long-term complications of such treatment, a surgical indication for patients with spinal deformities must be reviewed on an individual basis and considered carefully. A current systematic review appears necessary in order to be able to draw final conclusions on the indication for surgery in patients with spinal deformities.Clinical implications: In view of the increasing number of surgeons with an affiliation to industry, the indication for surgery needs to be given by independent conservative specialists for spinal deformities in order to provide an objective recommendation.