Great British medalists: A commentary based on a developmental systems theory perspective

Author(s):  
Martin I. Jones ◽  
Mark R. Wilson
Hypatia ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Burlein

This paper juxtaposes Deleuze's notion of the virtual alongside Oyama's notion of a developmental system in order to explore the promises and perils of thinking bodily identity as indeterminate at a time when new technologies render bodily ambiguity increasingly productive of both economic profit and power relations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letitia Meynell

I argue that it is time for many feminists to rethink their attitudes towards evolutionary biology, not because feminists have been wrong to be deeply sceptical about many of its claims, both explicit and implicit, but because biology itself has changed. A new appreciation for the importance of development in biology has become mainstream and a new ontology, associated with developmental systems theory (DST), has been introduced over the last two decades. This turn challenges some of the features of evolutionary biology that have most troubled feminists. DST undermines the idea of biological essences and challenges both nature/nurture and nature/culture distinctions. Freed from these conceptual constraints, evolutionary biology no longer poses the problems that have justified feminist scepticism. Indeed, feminists have already found useful applications for DST and I argue that they should expand their use of DST to support more radical and wide-ranging political theories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document