scholarly journals The 2017 American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) annual meeting: Taking a deeper dive into social media

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam A. Knoll ◽  
Brian Kavanagh ◽  
Matthew Katz
Author(s):  
Christina C. Huang ◽  
Kaitlyn Lapen ◽  
Kanan Shah ◽  
Jolie Kantor ◽  
Chiaojung Jillian Tsai ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 1400-1401
Author(s):  
C. Huang ◽  
K. Lapen ◽  
K. Shah ◽  
J. Kantor ◽  
C.J. Tsai ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4469-4469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurabh Dahiya ◽  
Ankit J. Kansagra ◽  
Syed S. Ali

Abstract Background: The use of social media is expanding in medicine. More and more healthcare professionals, patients and advocates are using social media as a common platform to enhance communication. Methods: Each year American Society of Hematology (ASH) creates a hashtag (#) followed by year of the annual meeting (e.g. ASH 2014 had this hashtag: #ASH14) on Twitter. We conducted a retrospective study of annual meeting's hashtag use on Twitter for past 4 annual meetings using data from Symplur, LLC. Symplur is an online forum offering analytics of the global Twitter based conversations. Following hashtags were used for analysis, #ASH11, #ASH12, #ASH13 and #ASH14. Results: Overall there is an increasing trend for use of annual meeting's hashtag (see table 1). Last year's meeting generated over 72 million impressions. Number of tweets being sent out is doubling every year. More twitter users are engaging in conversations than the year before using annual meeting's hashtag. Last year almost 4000 individual twitter accounts were used during the annual meeting. Number of tweets per participant has stayed relatively constant over past four years. @ash_hematology remains the most commonly mentioned twitter handle every year since 2011. In 2014 itself, @ash_hematology was mentioned over 2000 times. Conclusion: Twitter is a very powerful tool that amplifies the content of scientific meetings. Use of twitter using meeting's hashtag is increasing every year at annual ASH meetings. This analysis provides a snapshot of twitter activity at the conference. Avenues for further research are: trend identification, "influencer" identification, and qualitative analysis. Interdisciplinary research should focus on evaluation methods that can assess the quality, value, and impact of tweeting. Table 1. Year Impressions Tweets Participants Average tweet per participant 2011 12,255,646 3123 606 5 2012 18,153,786 5,094 870 6 2013 30,018,580 12,233 1942 6 2014 72,433,270 24,185 3977 6 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document