Residency Program Directors of United States Ophthalmology Programs: A Descriptive Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Kloosterboer ◽  
Nicolas A. Yannuzzi ◽  
Steven J. Gedde ◽  
Jayanth Sridhar
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Residency Program Directors

Survey of United States Neurosurgical Residency Program Directors

Neurosurgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Dade Lunsford ◽  
Amin Kassam ◽  
Yue-Fang Chang
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Residency Program Directors

scholarly journals Predicting Quality of Clinical Performance From Cardiology Fellowship Applications

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-264
Author(s):  
Michael W. Cullen ◽  
Thomas J. Beckman ◽  
Kristine M. Baldwin ◽  
Gregory J. Engstler ◽  
Jay Mandrekar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Faculty Evaluation ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Medical Society ◽  
Evaluation Scores ◽  
Alpha Omega ◽  
Residency Program Directors

Variables in cardiology fellowship applications have not been objectively analyzed against applicants' subsequent clinical performance. We investigated possible correlations in a retrospective cohort study of 65 cardiology fellows at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minn) who began 2 years of clinical training from July 2007 through July 2013. Application variables included the strength of comparative statements in recommendation letters and the authors' academic ranks, membership status in the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society, awards earned, volunteer activities, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, advanced degrees, publications, and completion of a residency program ranked in the top 6 in the United States. The outcome was clinical performance as measured by a mean of faculty evaluation scores during clinical training. The overall mean evaluation score was 4.07 ± 0.18 (scale, 1–5). After multivariable analysis, evaluation scores were associated with Alpha Omega Alpha designation (β=0.13; 95% CI, 0.01–0.25; P=0.03), residency program reputation (β=0.13; 95% CI, 0.05–0.21; P=0.004), and strength of comparative statements in recommendation letters (β=0.08; 95% CI, 0.01–0.15; P=0.02), particularly in letters from residency program directors (β=0.05; 95% CI, 0.01–0.08; P=0.009). Objective factors to consider in the cardiology fellowship application include Alpha Omega Alpha membership, residency program reputation, and comparative statements from residency program directors.

scholarly journals Payments by Industry to Residency Program Directors in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Stein J. Janssen ◽  
David W.G. Langerhuizen ◽  
Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs ◽  
David Ring
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Residency Program Directors

Perspectives on dermatology grand rounds: a survey of United States residency program directors

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. e310-e311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Cohen ◽  
Jennifer K. Tan ◽  
Steven T. Chen ◽  
Susan Burgin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Residency Program Directors ◽  
Grand Rounds

Stress and Burnout Among Residency Program Directors in United States Radiation Oncology Programs

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 746-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonya Aggarwal ◽  
Aaron S. Kusano ◽  
Justin Nathaniel Carter ◽  
Laura Gable ◽  
Charles R. Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Residency Program Directors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document