Does rapid maxillary expansion have long-term effects on airway dimensions and breathing?

2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Baratieri ◽  
Matheus Alves ◽  
Margareth Maria Gomes de Souza ◽  
Mônica Tirre de Souza Araújo ◽  
Lucianne Cople Maia
2003 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Vetlesen Westwood ◽  
James A. McNamara ◽  
Tiziano Baccetti ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi ◽  
David M. Sarver

2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanci Lara Oliveira De Felippe ◽  
Adriana C. Da Silveira ◽  
Grace Viana ◽  
Budi Kusnoto ◽  
Bonnie Smith ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paloma Velázquez ◽  
Elena Benito ◽  
Luis Alberto Bravo

2002 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Cameron ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi ◽  
Tiziano Baccetti ◽  
James A. McNamara

2010 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Gurcan Gurel ◽  
Badel Memili ◽  
Mustafa Erkan ◽  
Yusuf Sukurica

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the long-term changes in maxillary arch widths, overjet, and overbite in patients who were treated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) followed by edgewise appliances. Materials and Methods: The material for the study consisted of study casts taken from 41 patients (19 males, 22 females) on four different occasions (before treatment, T1; after RME, T2; after treatment, T3; and during follow-up period, T4). The upper intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths and overjet and overbite were measured on each set of study casts. Mean age of the subjects was 13.2 ± 1.3 years (range, 11.2–16.9 years) at T1, 13.3 ± 1.3 years (range, 11.3–17 years) at T2, 15.5 ± 1.4 years (range, 13.1–18.8 years) at T3, and 20.4 ± 1.6 years (range, 17.9–24.8 years) at T4. Results: The net increase in intercanine width, interpremolar width, intermolar width, overjet, and overbite was 1.4 ± 2.4 mm, 4.6 ± 2.6 mm, 4.3 ± 2.5 mm, 0.1 ± 0.6 mm, and 0.2 ± 0.6 mm, respectively, and the relapse rates were 37% for intercanine width, 19% for interpremolar width, and 17% for intermolar width at the end of the follow-up period. Conclusions: A significant amount of relapse occurred in maxillary arch widths at the postretention assessment, the greatest being in intercanine width. RME significantly decreased overbite and increased overjet, and a statistically significant decrease was observed in both overbite and overjet at the postretention assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document