Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age

2018 ◽  
Vol 219 (5) ◽  
pp. 474.e1-474.e12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan R. Blue ◽  
Meghan E. Beddow ◽  
Mariam Savabi ◽  
Vivek R. Katukuri ◽  
Conrad R. Chao
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (11) ◽  
pp. 1381-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony O. Odibo ◽  
Chinedu Nwabuobi ◽  
Linda Odibo ◽  
Karla Leavitt ◽  
Sarah Obican ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 184-195
Author(s):  
Minh Son Pham ◽  
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen ◽  
Dinh Vinh Tran

Small for gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) is difficult to define exactly. In this pregnancy condition, the fetus does not reach its biological growth potential as a consequence of impaired placental function, which may be because of a variety of factors. Fetuses with FGR are at risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality, and poor long-term health outcomes, such as impaired neurological and cognitive development, and cardiovascular and endocrine diseases in adulthood. At present no gold standard for the diagnosis of SGA/FGR exists. The first aim of this review is to: summarize areas of consensus and controversy between recently published national guidelines on small for gestational age or fetal growth restriction; highlight any recent evidence that should be incorporated into existing guidelines. Another aim to summary a number of interventions which are being developed or coming through to clinical trial in an attempt to improve fetal growth in placental insufficiency. Key words: fetal growth restriction (FGR), Small for gestational age (SGA)


2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. S186
Author(s):  
Odessa P. Hamidi ◽  
Camille Driver ◽  
Tamara Stampalija ◽  
Sarah Martinez ◽  
Diana Gumina ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document