growth standard
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

65
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S39
Author(s):  
Daisy Leon-Martinez ◽  
Lisbet S. Lundsberg ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Jennifer F. Culhane ◽  
Moeun Son ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S528-S529
Author(s):  
Sarah Heerboth ◽  
Amanda A. Allshouse ◽  
Susan E. Nourse ◽  
Bob M. Silver ◽  
William A. Grobman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-45
Author(s):  
Rotua Suriany Simamora ◽  
Puri Kresnawati

Stunting (pendek) berdasarkan umur adalah tinggi badan yang berada di bawah minus dua standar deviasi (<-2SD) berdasarkan tabel status gizi WHO child growth standard. Stunting dapat menjadi ancaman utama terhadap kualitas manusia Indonesia dan juga  ancaman terhadap kemampuan daya saing bangsa. Hal ini dapat terjadi karena anak stunted bukan hanya terganggu pertumbuhan fisiknya saja, melainkan juga terganggu perkembangan otaknya yang sangat mempengaruhi kemampuan dan prestasi di sekolah, produktivitas dan kreativitas di usia produktif. Asupan gizi seimbang dari makanan memegang peranan penting dalam proses pertumbuhan anak. Penerapan pola makan dengan gizi seimbang menekankan pola konsumsi pangan dalam jenis dan jumlah prinsip keanekaragaman pangan untuk mencegah masalah gizi. Komponen yang harus dipenuhi dalam penerapan pola makan gizi seimbang mencakup cukup secara kuantitas, kualitas, mengandung berbagai zat gizi dalam kehidupan sehari-hari serta dapat menyimpan zat gizi untuk mencukupi kebutuhan tubuh.  Penelitian ini adalah penelitian epidemiologi analitik observasional menggunakan desain cross sectional. Populasi dalam penelitian ini 200 responden dimana pengambilan sampel menggunakan quota sampling. Selanjutnya dilakukan analisis bivariat menggunakan chie suquare. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemenuhan pola makan gizi seimbang berhubungan dengan penanganan stunting pada balita dengan p value sebesar 0,035 dan Odds Ratio 2.304. Kata Kunci : Gizi Seimbang, Stunting, Balita


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianping Chen ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Xing Wei ◽  
Yingjun Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The common use of singleton fetal growth standard to access twin growth might lead to over-monitoring and treatment. We aimed to develop fetal growth standards for Chinese twins based on ultrasound measurements, and compare it with Zhang’s and other twin fetal growth charts. Methods A cohort of uncomplicated twin pregnancies were prospectively followed in 2014–2017. Smoothed estimates of fetal growth percentiles for both monochorionic (MC) and dichorionic (DC) twins were obtained using a linear mixed model. We also created growth charts for twins using a model-based approach proposed by Zhang et al. Our twin standards were compared with Hadlock’s (singleton) in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. Results A total of 398 twin pregnancies were included, with 214 MC and 582 DC live-born twins. The MC twins were slightly lighter than the DC twins, with small differences throughout the gestation. Our ultrasound-based fetal weight standards were comparable to that using Zhang’s method. Compared with previous references/standards from the US, Brazil, Italy and UK, our twins had very similar 50th percentiles, but narrower ranges between the 5th and 95th or 10th and 90th percentiles. Compared with the Hadlock’s standard, the risks of neonatal death and adverse perinatal outcomes for small for gestational age (SGA) versus non-SGA were substantially elevated using our standards. Conclusions A normal fetal growth standard for Chinese twins was created. The differences between MC and DC twins were clinically insignificant. The 50th weight percentiles of the Chinese twins were identical to those in other races/ethnicities but the ranges were markedly narrower. Our standard performed much better than the Hadlock’s in predicting low birth weight infants associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies. The present study also indicated that Zhang’s method is applicable to Chinese twins, and other areas may use Zhang’s method to generate their own curves for twins if deemed necessary.


2021 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 102942
Author(s):  
Pragyan Dash ◽  
Ritesh Shantilal Tandel ◽  
Nityanand Pandey ◽  
Paramita Banerjee Sawant ◽  
Debajit Sarma ◽  
...  

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 324
Author(s):  
Jeannie Flynn ◽  
Firas Farisi Alkaff ◽  
William Putera Sukmajaya ◽  
Sovia Salamah

Background: Determination of stunting and wasting always uses the WHO growth standard in Indonesia. However, it is believed that Indonesian children are “below” the global standard, thus the WHO standard is not reliable to present the actual prevalence. This study aims to compare the prevalence and determinants of stunting and underweight using WHO growth standard and national Indonesian growth reference. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in Musi sub-district, East Nusa Tenggara province in July 2019. East Nusa Tenggara province had the highest prevalence of stunting and underweight in Indonesia. The study population were children under five, and total sampling method was used for this study. Length/height-for-age and weight-for-age were plotted using WHO standard and national Indonesian reference. Univariate and multivariate binomial logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results: The prevalence of stunting and underweight were higher for the WHO standard than the national reference (53.9% vs 10.7% and 29.17% vs 17.7%; all p < 0.001). After adjusted for confounding factors, when the WHO standard was used, determinants of stunting were maternal mid-upper arm circumference below 23.5cm and maternal height below 150cm; determinants of underweight were intrauterine growth restriction, young maternal age during pregnancy, and multiple parities. When the national reference was used, no determinants was found for stunting; the determinants of underweight were intrauterine growth restriction and maternal education. Conclusions: The WHO standard is not suitable for representing child growth in Musi sub-district. Future studies should be done to re-evaluate the prevalence and determinants of stunting and underweight nationwide using the national Indonesian reference.


2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 757-764
Author(s):  
Anna Seidenari ◽  
Floriana Carbone ◽  
Paolo Ivo Cavoretto ◽  
Enrico Ferrazzi ◽  
Gianluigi Pilu ◽  
...  

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This study aimed to present a statistical method for assessing potential differences between fetal growth standard curves and local curve population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was an observational repeated measures longitudinal study. We used a simulation model to generate random distribution of the international population from the IG-21st for fetal AC using the original equations of means and standard deviations (SD) obtained by the fractional polynomial method. A general linear model (GLM) allowed us to calculate new equations originating from simulated intergrowth-21st data (SIM_IG21st) and to compare them, by visual inspection of the estimated coefficients and their 95% CI, with the original published. We used further GLMs for evaluating the goodness of fitting of our local curve and comparing the relative equations of means and SD with those of SIM_IG21st. Finally, the impact of percentile differences between the 2 curves was quantified. <b><i>Results:</i></b> SIM_IG21st data yielded very similar coefficients than those of IG-21st reference to such an extent that means and SD and percentiles of interest were identical to the original. The comparison between SIM_IG21st curve and local curves showed a nonsignificant intercept and a slight difference of the 2 slopes (GA and GA<sup>3</sup>) for the equations of the mean. As a result, the local curve resulted in greater AC values. A difference in the intercept but not in the slopes (GA<sup>2</sup>, GA<sup>3</sup>, and GA<sup>3</sup> * lnGA) was instead reported for the equations of the SD. In the percentile comparison, the local curve resulted in an overestimation of the 3rd and the 10th percentile that corresponded to the 4th and 12th percentiles of SIM_IG21st, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This statistical method allows sonographers to assess potential differences between standard curves and local curve population, enabling a more proper identification of abnormal growth trajectories.


2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
pp. 1099-1106

Background: The appropriate assessment of nutritional status in children is an essential aspect of health supervision. Currently, there are two references used for growth assessment in Thailand. The WHO child growth standard, which has been widely used since 2007, and the Thai growth reference developed by the Ministry of Public Health, which has been used since 1998. However, there were very few studies that made a direct comparison between both tools. Objective: To compare the nutritional status of healthy pediatric patients in Ramathibodi Hospital assessed by the World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standard and the Thai growth reference. Materials and Methods: The present study was a cross-sectional study. The data were collected from all pediatric patients registered in the outpatient department (OPD) of Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital between January 2013 and December 2018. All healthy children (aged 0 to 15 years) were included. Exclusion criteria of possibly chronically ill children were defined by those who were 1) visiting subspecialty clinics, 2) OPD and emergency room (ER) visits more than ten times per year, 3) having ICD-10 of chronic conditions, or 4) had been admitted in the hospital during the study. The weight and height or length data were extracted from the Electronic Medical Record system. All data were analyzed by the Stata Statistical Software focusing on age and sex-specific Z-scores, which references the WHO child growth standard and the Thai growth reference. Results: Sixty-two thousand one hundred four OPD visits were divided into 31,662 OPD visits for boys and 30,442 OPD visits for girls. Percent of weight for age and height or length for age more than +2 Z-score of both boys and girls when using the Thai growth reference was greater than that using the WHO child growth standard, especially for children aged 0 to 12 months. The Thai growth reference classified as overweight were approximately 10.26% to 31.12% more than using the WHO child growth standard. There was no difference in classification of height by both standards. Conclusion: There was a difference in classification of nutritional status between the Thai growth reference and the WHO child growth standard. Keywords: Nutritional status, Pediatric growth reference, Assessment tool, Overweight


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document