Durability of Bioprosthetic Surgical Aortic Valves in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation

Author(s):  
Abdelrahman I. Abushouk ◽  
Omar Abdelfattah ◽  
Anas Saad ◽  
Toshiaki Isogai ◽  
Shashank Shekhar ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 571-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Toggweiler ◽  
David A. Wood ◽  
Josep Rodés-Cabau ◽  
Samir Kapadia ◽  
Alexander B. Willson ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. S113
Author(s):  
D.A. Wood ◽  
S. Toggweiler ◽  
J. Ye ◽  
A. Cheung ◽  
J. Leipsic ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
A. B. Voevodin ◽  
A. A. Allenov ◽  
V. V. Bazylev

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Marco Angelillis

Transcatheter valve in valve (ViV) implantation actually represents a valid alternative to surgical reinterventions in patients with previous surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). In patients less than 80 years old, it is crucial to correctly position the new valve leaving a feasible and easy access to coronary ostia, both for future percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than for a future possible TAVinTAV procedure. We report a 71 year old man with prior AVR presented with structural valve deterioration (SVD) leading to severe aortic stenosis. In order to guarantee comfortable coronary access we aligned, the commissures of the new percutaneous valve with the ones of the surgical bioprothesis by reconstructing the headframes of the surgical bioprosthesis with computer tomography (CT) and fluoro-CT.


Heart ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (19) ◽  
pp. 1573-1580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Schmidt ◽  
Michael Schlüter ◽  
Hannes Alessandrini ◽  
Ozan Akdag ◽  
Dimitry Schewel ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 689-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Linke ◽  
Felix Woitek ◽  
Marc W. Merx ◽  
Conrad Schiefer ◽  
Sven Möbius-Winkler ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. 1047-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Ihlberg ◽  
Henrik Nissen ◽  
Niels-Erik Nielsen ◽  
Andreas Rück ◽  
Rolf Busund ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document