Subtotal colectomy versus left hemicolectomy for the elective treatment of splenic flexure colonic neoplasia

2018 ◽  
Vol 216 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Beisani ◽  
Francesc Vallribera ◽  
Albert García ◽  
Laura Mora ◽  
Sebastiano Biondo ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 170-174
Author(s):  
Yoshiro Itatani ◽  
Kenji Kawada ◽  
Koya Hida ◽  
Yasunori Deguchi ◽  
Nobu Oshima ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 87-99
Author(s):  
Kathryn Thomas ◽  
Charles Maxwell-Armstrong ◽  
Austin Acheson

Author(s):  
Salomone Di Saverio ◽  
Kostantinos Stasinos ◽  
Weronyka Stupalkowska ◽  
Umberto Bracale ◽  
Pierpaolo Sileri ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction This How-I-Do-It article presents a modified Deloyers procedure by mean of the case of a 67-year-old female with adenocarcinoma extending for a long segment and involving the splenic flexure and proximal descending colon who underwent a laparoscopic left extended hemicolectomy (LELC) with derotation of the right colon and primary colorectal anastomosis. Background While laparoscopic extended right colectomy is a well-established procedure, LELC is rarely used (mainly for distal transverse or proximal descending colon carcinomas extending to the area of the splenic flexure). LELC presents several technical challenges which are demonstrated in this How-I-Do-It article. Technique and methods Firstly, the steps needed to mobilize the left colon and procure a safe approach to the splenic flexure are described, especially when a tumor is closely related to it. This is achieved by mobilization and resection of the descending colon, while maintaining a complete mesocolic excision to the level of the duodenojejunal ligament for the inferior mesenteric vein and flush to the aorta for the inferior mesenteric artery. Subsequently, we depict the adjuvant steps required to enable a primary anastomosis by trying to mobilize the transverse colon and release as much of the mesocolic attachments at the splenic flexure area. Finally, we present the rare instance when a laparoscopic derotation of the ascending colon is required to provide a tension-free anastomosis. The resection is completed by delivery of the fully derotated ascending colon and hepatic flexure through a suprapubic mini-Pfannenstiel incision. The primary colorectal anastomosis is subsequently fashioned in a tension-free way and provides for a quick postoperative recovery of the patient. Results This modified Deloyers procedure preserves the middle colic since the fully mobilized mesocolon allows for a tension-free anastomosis while maintaining better blood supply to the mobilized stump. Also, by eliminating the need for a mesenteric window and the transposition of the caecum, we allow the small bowel to rest over the anastomosis and the mobilized transverse colon and reduce the possibility of an internal herniation of the small bowel into the mesentery. Conclusions Laparoscopic derotation of the right colon and a partial, modified Deloyers procedure preserving the middle colic vessels are feasible techniques in experienced hands to provide primary anastomosis after LELC with improved functional outcome. Nevertheless, it is important to consider anatomical aspects of the left hemicolectomy along with oncological considerations, to provide both a safe oncological resection along with good postoperative bowel function.


2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 1027-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Manceau ◽  
Arnaud Mori ◽  
Armelle Bardier ◽  
Jeremy Augustin ◽  
Sylvie Breton ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Bono D ◽  
Galati S ◽  
Potenza E ◽  
Loddo F ◽  
Bonaccors L ◽  
...  

Introduction: Splenic flexure tumors are quite rare, accounting for 2% to 8% of all colorectal cancers. The heterogeneity of the vascular support and lymphatic drainage of the splenic flexure make the surgical management complex and non-standardized. The aim of the study is to compare the four surgical techniques (extended right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, segmental colonic resection, and total colectomy) in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes.Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients from two hospitals of Turin (the Martini hospital and the San Giovanni Bosco hospital) between September 1998 and March 2020 have surgical visit for splenic flexure cancer. The data reported in the database include preoperative, postoperative, histopathological characteristics, and survival results. Univariate and multivariate analysis are performed to evaluate the confounding factors influencing overall and disease-free survival.Results and Discussion: A total of 173 patients treated for splenic flexure tumors are included in the study. The four groups are similar on the baseline characteristics of the patients. Clavien Dindo ≥ 3 postoperative complications and 30-day mortality are comparable in the four groups (p=0.216 e p=0.213). Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival did not show significant differences between the four surgical techniques (p=1.08 e p=0.28). No statistically significant differences were found between the four groups for baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and TNM staging.Conclusion: Segmental colonic resection, extended right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy and total colectomy show no significant difference in short-term and oncological outcomes in cancer of the splenic flexure. Further studies with a higher level of evidence are needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document