223: Emergency Department Bedside Ultrasound Measurement of Caval Index as Non-Invasive Determination of Low Central Venous Pressure: A Multi-Center Validation of an Emergency Department Protocol

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. S69
Author(s):  
A.V. Hansen ◽  
A.J. Medak ◽  
C. Campbell ◽  
A. Nagdev ◽  
E.M. Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Bedside Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Measurement ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Low Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Caval Index

Emergency Department Bedside Ultrasonographic Measurement of the Caval Index for Noninvasive Determination of Low Central Venous Pressure

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun D. Nagdev ◽  
Roland C. Merchant ◽  
Alfredo Tirado-Gonzalez ◽  
Craig A. Sisson ◽  
Michael C. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Low Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Caval Index

scholarly journals Should we stop using the determination of central venous pressure as a way to estimate cardiac preload?

2012 ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Smith Ceron Arias ◽  
Manuel Felipe Muñoz Nañez
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Blood Volume ◽  
Pulse Pressure ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Pressure Change ◽  
Cardiac Preload ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
End Diastolic Volume ◽  
Dynamic Variables

The determination of the values of central venous pressure has long been used as a guideline for volumetric therapy in the resuscitation of the critical patient, but the performance of such parameter is currently being questioned as an effective measurement of cardiac preload. This has aroused great interest in the search for more accurate parameters to determine cardiac preload and a patient’s blood volume. Goals and Methodology: Based on literature currently available, we aim to discuss the performance of central venous pressure as an effective parameter to determine cardiac preload. Results and Conclusion: Estimating variables such as end-diastolic ventricular area and global end-diastolic volume have a better performance than central venous pressure in determining cardiac preload. Despite the best performance of these devices, central venous pressure is still considered in our setting as the most practical and most commonly available way to assess the patient’s preload. Only dynamic variables such as pulse pressure change are superior in determining an individual’s blood volume.

scholarly journals A Clinical Study on Correlation of Ultrasonographic Measurement of Caval Index with Central Venous Pressure

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1 (P-I)) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Balaji Thiyagarajan ◽  
◽  
Sharanu Patil ◽  
Alagu Annamalai ◽  
Vinayak Seenappa Pujari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Caval Index
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document