Role of Point of Care Ultra Sound (POCUS) in Assessment of Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Patients

Background: Initial fluid resuscitation in sepsis must be guided by clinical judgment based on ongoing reevaluation of the hemodynamic status (heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, temperature, urine output) and ultrasound measurements (stroke volume, cardiac output, lung ultrasound and inferior vena cava diameter) as positive fluid balance is harmful. Methods: Adults Patients (≥ 18 years old) with symptoms or signs of tissue hypoperfusion (Sequential organ failure assessment score SOFA≥ 2) are included. Patients with elevated intra-abdominal pressure (as, ascites, pregnancy), Recent abdominal operation, cannot lie flat, Patient on mechanical ventilation and patients with valvular heart disease were excluded. IVC CI, SV, COP and B mean score were measured on patient arrival and after every 10 ml/kg isotonic saline over the first hour of patient arrival. Thereafter, patients were divided into two groups high caval index and low caval index according to inferior vena cava collapsibility index. Results: Among our 50 patients,38% of patients were with high caval index and 62% have low caval index. Conclusion: POCUS has additive value in guiding of fluid resuscitation in sepsis in order to avoid fluid overload and to identify proper timing of vasopressor use.

A STUDY OF INFERIOR VENA CAVA AND RIGHT VENTRICLE DIAMETER IN ASSESSMENT OF VOLUME STATUS USING ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT OF A TERITIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL

INTRODUCTION: Physical examination ndings, vital signs, and laboratory results are other parameters used to estimate the intravascular volume status. These parameters are not reliable because they are inuenced by various clinical conditions.Some of these parameters may be found normal as the compensatory mechanisms of the body initiate; thus, this may result in delays in the detection of volume loss. The study was conducted in 50 patients and 50 control METHODOLOGY: s who visited the Emergency Department. Diameter of the IVC in expiration was lesser in the pre-uid re RESULTS: suscitation with a mean of 1.15 compared to the 1.52 in the post-uid resuscitation group. dIVCi – diameter of the IVC in inspiration was lesser in the pre-uid resuscitation with a mean of 0.81 compared to the 1.81 in the post-uid resuscitation group. IVC CI – IVC caval index was CONCLUSION: more in the pre-uid resuscitation with a mean of 33.42 compared to the 16.74 in the post-uid resuscitation group. dRV – diameter of the right ventricle was lesser in the pre-uid resuscitation with a mean of 2.80 compared to the 3.14 in the post-uid resuscitation group.

P892 Accuracy of right atrial pressure estimation using a multi-parameter approach derived from Inferior vena cava semi-automated edge-tracking echocardiography

Background In clinical practice, as stated in the ASE guidelines, the echocardiographic estimation of right atrial pressure (RAP) is based on the size of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and its inspiratory collapse. However, this method has proven to have limits of reliability and reproducibility. The use of a recently developed software that with a semi-automatic technique highlight the edges of the IVC could help to standardize the echocardiographic assessment of RAP. Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to assess feasibility and accuracy of a new semi-automated approach to estimate the RAP. Standard acquired echocardiographic images were processed with a semi-automatic technique, indexes related to the collapsibility of the vessel during inspiration (Caval Index, CI), during the whole respiratory cycle (Respiratory Caval Index, RCI) and through the heart cycle transmitted movements’ (Cardiac Caval Index (CCI) were derived (figure 1). Using these indexes, we developed two models: a) the Binary Tree Model (BTM), further divided in BTM3 and BTM5 (RAP estimated in 3 and 5 classes, respectively); b) the Regression Model (RM), further divided in RM linear (continuous model) and RM3 and RM5 (RAP estimated in 3 and 5 classes respectively). RAP assessed using these innovative techniques were compared with two standard estimation (SE) echocardiographic methods A and B. Direct RAP measurements obtained during a right heart catheterization (RHC), performed within 6 hours, were used as reference. Results 62 consecutive ‘all-comers’ patients that had a RHC were enrolled; 13 patients were excluded for technical reasons. Therefore 49 patients were included in this study (26 males and 23 females; mean age of 62.2 ± 15.2 years, 75.5% pulmonary hypertension, 34.7% severe left ventricular dysfunction and 51% right ventricular dysfunction). The two SE methods showed poor accuracy for RAP estimation (method A: ME = 51%, R2= 0.22; method B: ME = 69%, R2= 0.26). Instead, the new semi-automatic methods BTM3 and BTM5 based on parameters derived from IVC edge tracking (mean IVC diameter, CI, CCI and RCI) had a misclassification error of only 14% (R2 = 0.47) and 22% (R2 = 0.61), respectively, to classify RAP. The accuracy was lower for RM than BTM (RM3: ME = 61%, R2 = 0.39; RM5: ME = 55%, R2 = 0.39). However, the RM showed the lowest mean bias in estimating RAP: 0.23 [-8.34; 8.81] mmHg. Conclusions A multi-parametric approach using the new indexes, such as CCI and RCI, derived from a semi-automated edge tracking of the IVC is a promising tool for a more accurate estimation of RAP. This study proposes an innovative method for the non-invasive estimation of the RAP, which requires confirmation on larger population. Abstract P892 Figure 1

Accuracy of Ultrasonographic Measurements of Inferior Vena Cava to Determine Fluid Responsiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: Fluid responsiveness is the ability to increase the cardiac output in response to a fluid challenge. Only about 50% of patients receiving fluid resuscitation for acute circulatory failure increase their stroke volume, but the other 50% may worsen their outcome. Therefore, predicting fluid responsiveness is needed. In this purpose, in recent years, the assessment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) through ultrasound (US) has become very popular. The aim of our work was to systematically review all the previously published studies assessing the accuracy of the diameter of IVC or its respiratory variations measured through US in predicting fluid responsiveness. Data Sources: We searched in the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science databases for all relevant articles from inception to September 2017. Study Selection: Included articles specifically addressed the accuracy of IVC diameter or its respiratory variations assessed by US in predicting the fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated or not, adult or pediatric patients. Data Extraction: We included 26 studies that investigated the role of the caval index (IVC collapsibility or distensibility) and 5 studies on IVC diameter. Data Synthesis: We conducted a meta-analysis for caval index with 20 studies: The pooled area under the curve, logarithmic diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-0.83), 2.02 (95% CI: 1.29-2.89), 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62-0.80), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64-0.85), respectively. Conclusion: An extreme heterogeneity of included studies was highlighted. Ultrasound evaluation of the diameter of the IVC and its respiratory variations does not seem to be a reliable method to predict fluid responsiveness.