scholarly journals Robot-assisted thoracic surgery for apical located neurogenic tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuqiang Wang ◽  
Hanlu Zhang ◽  
Guanghao Qiu ◽  
Yun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Neurogenic Tumors

Continuous erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in robotic lung lobectomy: a case report

2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162110058
Author(s):  
Edoardo Ceraolo ◽  
Eleonora Balzani ◽  
Giulio Luca Rosboch ◽  
Francesco Guerrera ◽  
Paraskevas Lyberis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Lung Lobectomy ◽  
Erector Spinae Plane Block ◽  
Iatrogenic Complications ◽  
Anesthesia Technique ◽  
Right Lobe ◽  
Sparing Effect

Background: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been described as an effective regional anesthesia technique in thoracic parenchymal surgery. Evidence highlighting the use of this technique continuously via perifascial catheter is lacking. Case presentation: In this case report, we present the case of a patient scheduled for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for a pulmonary neoformation in the lower right lobe. We decided to manage this patient with a multimodal approach in order to have an opioid-sparing effect. This is the first reported case of continuous ESPB in robot-assisted thoracic surgery. Conclusions: Anesthesiologists should consider this method in surgery that is slower than conventional surgery, such as robot-assisted, and less invasive than thoracotomy, which does not warrant the use of neuroaxial or paravertebral techniques that increase the risk of iatrogenic complications.

scholarly journals Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy or segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianglei Ma ◽  
Xiaoyao Li ◽  
Shifu Zhao ◽  
Jiawei Wang ◽  
Wujia Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Short Term

Abstract Background It remains no clear conclusion about which is better between robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term and long-term efficacy between RATS and VATS for NSCLC. Methods Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Medline, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for studies published before December 2020. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Fixed or random effect models were applied according to heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Results A total of 18 studies including 11,247 patients were included in the meta-analyses, of which 5114 patients were in the RATS group and 6133 in the VATS group. Compared with VATS, RATS was associated with less blood loss (WMD = − 50.40, 95% CI -90.32 ~ − 10.48, P = 0.010), lower conversion rate (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.43 ~ 0.60, P < 0.001), more harvested lymph nodes (WMD = 1.72, 95% CI 0.63 ~ 2.81, P = 0.002) and stations (WMD = 0.51, 95% CI 0.15 ~ 0.86, P = 0.005), shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (WMD = − 0.61, 95% CI -0.78 ~ − 0.44, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (WMD = − 1.12, 95% CI -1.58 ~ − 0.66, P < 0.001), lower overall complication rate (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 ~ 0.99, P = 0.020), lower recurrence rate (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36 ~ 0.72, P < 0.001), and higher cost (WMD = 3909.87 USD, 95% CI 3706.90 ~ 4112.84, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between RATS and VATS in operative time, mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Sensitivity analysis showed that no significant differences were found between the two techniques in conversion rate, number of harvested lymph nodes and stations, and overall complication. Conclusions The results revealed that RATS is a feasible and safe technique compared with VATS in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes. Moreover, more randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques with rigorous study designs are still essential to evaluate the value of robotic surgery for NSCLC.

Navigating the Pathway to Robotic Competency in General Thoracic Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Seder ◽  
Stephen D. Cassivi ◽  
Dennis A. Wigle
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Skill Acquisition ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Robotic Skills ◽  
Competency Based

Objective Although robotic technology has addressed many of the limitations of traditional videoscopic surgery, robotic surgery has not gained widespread acceptance in the general thoracic community. We report our initial robotic surgery experience and propose a structured, competency-based pathway for the development of robotic skills. Methods Between December 2008 and February 2012, a total of 79 robot-assisted pulmonary, mediastinal, benign esophageal, or diaphragmatic procedures were performed. Data on patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were retrospectively collected and analyzed. During the study period, one surgeon and three residents participated in a triphasic, competency-based pathway designed to teach robotic skills. The pathway consisted of individual preclinical learning followed by mentored preclinical exercises and progressive clinical responsibility. Results The robot-assisted procedures performed included lung resection (n = 38), mediastinal mass resection (n = 19), hiatal or para-esophageal hernia repair (n = 12), and Heller myotomy (n = 7), among others (n = 3). There were no perioperative mortalities, with a 20% complication rate and a 3% readmission rate. Conversion to a thoracoscopic or open approach was required in eight pulmonary resections to facilitate dissection (six) or to control hemorrhage (two). Fewer major perioperative complications were observed in the later half of the experience. All residents who participated in the thoracic surgery robotic pathway perform robot-assisted procedures as part of their clinical practice. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracic surgery can be safely learned when skill acquisition is guided by a structured, competency-based pathway.

scholarly journals Is robot assisted thoracic surgery better than video assisted?

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 74-74
Author(s):  
Pavlos Papoulidis ◽  
Marco Nardini ◽  
Joel Dunning
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Better Than

scholarly journals Robot Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS)

10.5772/53896 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohiro Kajiwara ◽  
Masatoshi Kakihana ◽  
Jitsuo Usuda ◽  
Tatsuo Ohira ◽  
Norihiko Kawate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Robot Assisted

Comparison of the Early Robot-Assisted Lobectomy Experience to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer a Single-Institution Case Series Matching Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 305-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Jin Jang ◽  
Hyun-Sung Lee ◽  
Seong Yong Park ◽  
Jae Ill Zo
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Vats Lobectomy ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Objective Robotic surgery has evolved in urology, gynecology, and general surgery and seems to be an oncologically sound surgical approach. Robotic surgery has been infrequently reported for pulmonary lobectomy. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of our early experience in performing robot-assisted lobectomy (RAL) with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Methods Between February and October 2009, 40 patients underwent RAL for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. The dissection and anatomic isolation of the hilar structures were performed using two arms of the da Vinci S system. A retrospective comparison with two VATS groups was performed, our initial 40 VATS patients (between January 2006 and February 2007) and our most recent 40 VATS patients (between June 2008 and September 2009). The entire experience with VATS lobectomy is 163 cases. Results In the RAL group, the mean age was 64 years, and there were 23 male patients. Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 29 patients with a mean tumor size of 3.5 cm. There were no conversions to open thoracotomy. Among the patients in our initial and recent VATS lobectomy groups, the conversion rate was 3 (8%) and 2 (5%) patients, respectively. The operative time for the RAL (240 ± 62 minutes) and the initial VATS lobectomy groups (257 ± 57 minutes) were similar but was longer than the recent VATS lobectomy group (161 ± 39 minutes, P < 0.001). However, the rate of postoperative complications in the RAL group (n = 4, 10%) was significantly lower than that of the initial VATS group (n = 13, 32.5%, P = 0.027) and similar to that of the recent VATS group (n = 7, 17.5%, P = 0.755). Intraoperative bleeding was reduced in the RAL group compared with the initial VATS group (219 mL vs 374 mL P = 0.017), and the median length of postoperative stay was significantly shorter for the RAL group compared with the initial VATS group (6 vs 9 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions The outcomes of our early RAL experience was comparable to the our outcomes achieved with VATS lobectomy, whether performed early or late.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document