scholarly journals Rotator Cuff Repair in the Pediatric Population Displays Favorable Outcomes: A Systematic Review

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nolan B. Condron ◽  
Joshua T. Kaiser ◽  
Dhanur Damodar ◽  
Kyle R. Wagner ◽  
Aghogho Evuarherhe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Cuff Repair

No difference between tenotomy vs tenodesis for the long head of the biceps tendinopathy in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-96
Author(s):  
Nicola Maffulli ◽  
Rocco Papalia ◽  
Guglielmo Torre ◽  
Sebastiano Vasta ◽  
Giuseppe Papalia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Cuff Repair

Return to Work After Primary Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652097542
Author(s):  
Eric D. Haunschild ◽  
Ron Gilat ◽  
Ophelie Lavoie-Gagne ◽  
Michael C. Fu ◽  
Tracy Tauro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Workers Compensation ◽  
Work Intensity ◽  
Rates Of Return ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Rotator cuff tears are a prevalent pathology in injured workers, causing significant economic ramifications and time away from work. To date, published articles on work outcomes after rotator cuff repair have not been cumulatively assessed and analyzed. Purpose: To systematically review reports on return to work after rotator cuff repair and perform a meta-analysis on factors associated with improved work outcomes. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of return-to-work investigations was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Individual studies reporting rates of return to previous work with level of evidence 1 to 4 were independently screened by 2 authors for inclusion, and study quality was assessed using the Methodologic Index for Non-randomized Studies and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Work outcome data were synthesized and analyzed using random effects modeling to identify differences in rates of return to previous work as a function of operative technique, work intensity, and workers’ compensation status. Results: Thirteen retrospective investigations comprising 1224 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair met inclusion criteria for this investigation. Across all investigations, a weighted average of 62.3% of patients returned to previous level of work at 8.15 ± 2.7 months (mean ± SD) after surgery. Based on random effects modeling, higher rates of return to previous work were identified with decreasing work intensity ( P < .001), while rates were similar between open and arthroscopic repair technique ( P = .418) and between workers’ compensation and non–workers’ compensation cohorts ( P = .089). All shoulder pain and functional outcome assessments demonstrated significant improvements at final follow-up when compared with baseline across all investigations. Conclusion: The majority of injured workers undergoing rotator cuff repair return to previous work at approximately 8 months after surgery. Despite this, >35% of patients are unable to return to their previous work level after their repair procedure. Similar rates of return to work can be anticipated regardless of workers’ compensation status and operative technique, while patients in occupations with higher physical intensity experience inferior work outcomes.

Type 2 retear after arthroscopic single-row, double-row and suture bridge rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yehia H. Bedeir ◽  
Adam P. Schumaier ◽  
Ghada Abu-Sheasha ◽  
Brian M. Grawe
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Cuff Repair

Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair and Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 127-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane J. Nho ◽  
Michael K. Shindle ◽  
Seth L. Sherman ◽  
Kevin B. Freedman ◽  
Stephan Lyman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Mini Open

Radiographic shoulder parameters and their relationship to outcomes following rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857321989598
Author(s):  
Musa B Zaid ◽  
Nathan M Young ◽  
Valentina Pedoia ◽  
Brian T Feeley ◽  
C Benjamin Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Critical Shoulder Angle ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Acromion Index ◽  
Bony Morphology ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Angle

Background Anatomic parameters, such as the critical shoulder angle and acromion index, have emerged as methods to quantify scapular anatomy and may contribute to rotator cuff pathology. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the published literature on influences of scapular morphology on the development of re-tears and patient-reported outcomes following rotator cuff repair. Methods A systematic review of the Embase and PubMed databases was performed to identify published studies on the potential influence of scapular bony morphology and re-tear rates and patient-reported outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Studies were reviewed by two authors. Results A total of 615 unique titles and 49 potentially relevant abstracts were reviewed, with eight published manuscripts identified for inclusion. Two of three papers reported no relationship between these acromion index and rotator cuff re-tear rate, while one paper found an increased re-tear rate. All three studies on critical shoulder angle found a significant association between critical shoulder angle and cuff re-tear rate. There was no clear relationship between any bony morphologic measurement and patient-reported outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Conclusions Rotator cuff re-tear rate appears to be significantly associated with the critical shoulder angle and glenoid inclination, while not clearly associated with acromial morphologic measurements.

Revision rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 624-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Brochin ◽  
Ryley Zastrow ◽  
Lindsay Hussey-Andersen ◽  
Bradford O. Parsons ◽  
Paul J. Cagle
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Revision Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Cuff Repair

Does an Increased Critical Shoulder Angle Affect Re-tear Rates and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Rotator Cuff Repair? A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 2938-2947.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Sheean ◽  
Darren de SA ◽  
Taylor Woolnough ◽  
Daniel J. Cognetti ◽  
Jeffrey Kay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Critical Shoulder Angle ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Angle
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document