Noninvasive Midterm Follow-Up of Radial Artery Bypass Grafts With 16-Slice Computed Tomography

2006 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Di Lazzaro ◽  
Temistocle Ragni ◽  
Gino Di Manici ◽  
Giuliana Bardelli ◽  
Uberto Da Col ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 21-29
Author(s):  
Boukhmis Abdelkader ◽  
Nouar Mohamed El-Amin

Purpose: To assess the coronary bypass grafts patency and the repeat revascularization rate, six months after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: We prospectively enrolled 145 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG between June 2014 and June 2016. We performed at 6 months of follow up a coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients whose stress tests were negative and an invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the opposite case. Results: A total of 134 CTA and 11 ICA were performed, allowing the analysis of 321 grafts, including 143 left internal thoracic arteries (LITA), 89 right internal thoracic arteries (RITA) and 89 saphenous veins grafts (SVG). The average graft patency was 95.1% for LITA, 84.3% for RITA and 64% for SVG. The best patencies were obtained when these grafts were anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery (LAD): 96.3% for LITA, and 87.5% for RITA. SVG patency was homogeneous whether between the main right coronary artery and its branches (63.4% versus 65% respectively. p = 1), or between circumflex and RCA (72.7% versus. 63.9% respectively. p=0.6). On the right and circumflex coronary arteries, the patency of the SVG was significantly lower than that of RITA (66.26% versus 83.95% respectively, p = 0.011). At 6 months of follow up, the repeat revascularization rate was 2.07% (n=3/145). Conclusions: 6 months after CABG, RITA and LITA had good patencies especially on LAD, while SVG was occluded in almost a third of cases. On the circumflex and right coronary arteries, SVG patency was significantly lower than that of RITA. Keywords: Coronary Artery Bypass; Exercise Testing; Coronary Angiography; Computed Tomography Angiograph


2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 451
Author(s):  
Seung Ho Joo ◽  
Byoung Wook Choi ◽  
Jae Seung Seo ◽  
Young Jin Kim ◽  
Tae Hoon Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rajneesh Malhotra ◽  
Manisha Mishra ◽  
Poonam Khurana ◽  
Monika Aggarwal ◽  
Yugal Mishra ◽  
...  

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the postoperative graft patency assessment by multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) scan and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients 1 year after surgery. Methods Sixty-nine patients who underwent isolated CABG at least 1 year before the study, were subjected to both MSCT angiography with cardiac gating and CCA. The results were evaluated and compared. Results There were 209 grafts in 69 patients. All grafts were evaluated by both MSCT angiography and CCA. Seventy-eight grafts were on the anterior wall, 83 on the lateral wall and 48 on the inferior wall of the heart. On MSCT angiography, all left internal mammary arteries were visualized with 3-dimensional reconstruction and found to be patent. Of 209 grafts, 11 grafts (5.26%) were blocked, 6 grafts on the lateral wall and 5 on the inferior wall. All patent grafts were correctly evaluated by MSCT angiography (specificity 100%). However, 2 grafts that were found to be patent on MSCT angiography were blocked on CCA (MSCT sensitivity 81.8%). Conclusions Postoperative evaluation of coronary bypass grafts is possible with very good resolution by MSCT angiography. This method allows evaluation of the bypass grafts and the quality of anastomosis with a noninvasive method that is comparable with CCA.


Circulation ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 110 (11_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. II-23-II-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Cameron

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document