scholarly journals Predictors of Recurrent Aortic Insufficiency in Type I Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 1316-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Habertheuer ◽  
Rita Karianna Milewski ◽  
Joseph E. Bavaria ◽  
Mary Siki ◽  
Melanie Freas ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanjo Ko ◽  
Joseph E. Bavaria ◽  
Andreas Habertheuer ◽  
John G. Augoustides ◽  
Mary A. Siki ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 101-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziv Beckerman ◽  
Michael O. Kayatta ◽  
LaRonica McPherson ◽  
Jose N. Binongo ◽  
Yi Lasanajak ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joseph A. McGuire ◽  
Heather K. Hayanga ◽  
Jeremiah W. Hayanga ◽  
Daniel Sloyer ◽  
Matthew Ellison ◽  
...  

Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital anomaly often associated with aortic insufficiency. The exact anatomy of QAV is variable, and most cases have undergone aortic valve replacement. With the recognition that aortic valve repair achieves superior patient outcomes as compared to replacement, a systematic approach to autologous reconstruction of QAV is needed. This article reports 2 cases having successful repair utilizing geometric aortic annuloplasty rings, and describes a proposed scheme for repairing most QAV defects, based on relative leaflet and commissural characteristics. Using either tri-leaflet or bicuspid ring annuloplasty, the normal sub-commissural triangles can be remodeled into a 120° or 180° configuration, respectively, and then the leaflets can be sutured and plicated to fit annular geometry. With this approach, most quadricuspid valves potentially could undergo autologous reconstruction.


2015 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 2010-2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Mazzitelli ◽  
Steffen Pfeiffer ◽  
J. Scott Rankin ◽  
Theodor Fischlein ◽  
Yeong-Hoon Choi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marek Jasinski ◽  
Tomasz Plonek ◽  
Radoslaw Gocol ◽  
Piotr Pysz ◽  
Damian Hudziak ◽  
...  

ASVIDE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 514-514
Author(s):  
Ziv Beckerman ◽  
Michael O. Kayatta ◽  
LaRonica McPherson ◽  
Jose N. Binongo ◽  
Yi Lasanajak ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 1137-1144
Author(s):  
Oliver K Jawitz ◽  
Vignesh Raman ◽  
Jatin Anand ◽  
Muath Bishawi ◽  
Soraya L Voigt ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Aortic insufficiency (AI) is common in patients with proximal aortic disease, but limited options exist to facilitate aortic valve repair (AVr) in this population. This study reports ‘real-world’ early results of AVr using newly FDA-approved trileaflet and bicuspid geometric annuloplasty rings for patients with AI undergoing proximal aortic repair (PAR) in a single referral centre. METHODS All patients undergoing AVr with a rigid internal geometric annuloplasty ring (n = 47) in conjunction with PAR (ascending +/− root +/− arch) were included. Thirty-six patients underwent AVr with a trileaflet ring, and 11 patients underwent AVr with a bicuspid ring. The rings were implanted in the subannular position, and concomitant leaflet repair was performed if required for cusp prolapse identified after ring placement. RESULTS The median age was 58 years [interquartile range (IQR) 46–70]. PAR included supracoronary ascending replacement in 26 (55%) patients and remodelling valve-sparing root replacement with selective sinus replacement in 20 (42%) patients. Arch replacement was performed in 38 (81%) patients, including hemi-arch in 34 patients and total arch in 4 patients. There was no 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Preoperative AI was 3–4+ in 37 (79%) patients. Forty-one (87%) patients had zero–trace AI on post-repair transoesophageal echocardiography, and 6 patients had 1+ AI. The median early post-repair mean gradient was 13 mmHg (IQR 5–20). Follow-up imaging was available in 32 (68%) patients at a median of 11 months (IQR 10–13) postsurgery. AI was ≤1+ in 97% of patients with 2+ AI in 1 patient. All patients were alive and free from aortic valve reintervention at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Early results with geometric rigid internal ring annuloplasty for AVr in patients undergoing PAR appear promising and allow a standardized approach to repair with annular diameter reduction and cusp plication when needed. Longer-term follow-up will be required to ensure the durability of the procedure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 70-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Contino ◽  
Andrea Mangini ◽  
Claudia Romagnoni ◽  
Carlo Antona

2020 ◽  
Vol 160 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Siki ◽  
Andreas Habertheuer ◽  
Joseph E. Bavaria ◽  
Caroline Komlo ◽  
Maxwell Hunt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document