Pass On What You Have Learned: A Structured Mentor-Mentee Concept for the Implementation of a Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Program

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Starting a minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) for mitral valve repair (MVR) program is challenging as it requires a new learning curve, but compromising surgical results at the same time is not acceptable. Here, we describe our surgical educational experience of starting a new MICS program at a university heart center in Germany. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A dedicated team for the new MICS program including 2 cardiac surgeons, 1 cardiac anesthetist, 1 perfusionist, and 1 scrub nurse was chosen. The use of long shafted instruments was trained in a low-cost self-assembled MICS simulator, and the EACTS endoscopic dry lab course was visited. Thereafter, 1 MICS center was visited for direct observation and peer-to-peer education for 6 weeks. The mentor observed the first 10 cases performed by the mentee. The surgical mitral valve expertise of 1 single cardiac surgeon was retrospectively analyzed between April 2016 and April 2021. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Before the implementation of the MICS-MVR program, 18 mitral valve operations have been performed through sternotomy between April 2016 and October 2018 including 12 replacements and 6 ring annuloplasties. After starting the MICS-MVR program, 73 mitral operations have been performed by the same surgeon of which 53 video-assisted through minithoracotomy (72.6%). 83.1% of the MICS procedures included complex repair (<i>n</i> = 38) and ring annuloplasty (<i>n</i> = 6). Open heart MV surgery was necessary in 20 patients due to concomitant procedures (<i>n</i> = 8), redo procedures (<i>n</i> = 2), severe endocarditis (<i>n</i> = 4), or contraindication for MICS such as PAD (<i>n</i> = 6). There have been no deaths, 1 stroke, and 1 cardiac vascular (RCX) complication. Two patients required conversion to sternotomy and one pericardiocentesis in the long term. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Typically, excellent exposure and high repair rates of the MV has led us offer MICS approach to a majority of patients with isolated MV disease. Careful planning and a strict mentor-mentee concept facilitated a safe startup of an MICS program in a busy university heart center.

Complex Repair of a Completely Fused Nullicuspid Aortic Valve Late in Adolescence

We report a case of an 18-year-old female who presented with severe aortic stenosis and insufficiency, eight years following resection of a subaortic membrane. On echocardiography, she was found to have a completely fused or nullicuspid valve, with three equal sinuses and three commissural fusions. Aortic valve repair included leaflet tricuspidization, three commissurotomies, trileaflet ring annuloplasty, and pericardial leaflet reconstruction. At one year follow-up, the patient is asymptomatic, with stable gradients.

Morphological diversity of the tricuspid posterior leaflet affects surgical complexity for control of tricuspid regurgitation

Objective: We investigated the effect of morphological diversity of the tricuspid valve with multiple posterior leaflets on the technical outcomes of tricuspid valve repair. Methods: From April 2016 to November 2020, 141 patients were diagnosed with secondary tricuspid regurgitation associated with left heart disease and underwent tricuspid valve repair. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and echocardiographic data of patients who underwent both preoperative and postoperative transthoracic echocardiography. We divided the patients into two groups according to the surgical technique used to treat tricuspid regurgitation: ring annuloplasty alone (Group 1, n=109) or additional approximation of leaflet edges (edge-to-edge repair) with ring annuloplasty (Group 2, n=32). We measured the morphological diversity of the tricuspid valve during the operation in all patients. Results: The preoperative tricuspid regurgitation score was higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (2.1±0.78 vs. 1.6±0.7, respectively; p=0.0046), and Group 2 contained more patients with two posterior leaflets than Group 1 [20 (63%) vs. 36 (33%), respectively; p=0.003]. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the presence of two posterior leaflets was an independent risk factor for additional procedures during tricuspid valve repair (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–6.1; p=0.033). Conclusions: Additional procedures to reduce tricuspid regurgitation were required more frequently in patients with two posterior leaflets of the tricuspid valve. The morphological diversity of two posterior leaflets is a potential risk factor for a more complicated tricuspid repair.

Comparison of Ring and Suture Annuloplasty in the Treatment of Tricuspid Regurgitation

Background: Significant TR is common in patients with cardiac disease and because of its prognostic importance, TV came to the spotlight in the last decades. Functional TR is mostly treated when undergoing left-sided valve surgery, whereas idiopathic TR surgery is uncommon. The aim of this study is to compare the durability of tricuspid valve annuloplasty techniques, and to explore the optimal method for TV repair surgery. Methods: 1005 patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair from February 2012 to March 2019, were retrospectively studied. The patients had tricuspid valve repair while receiving surgery for other cardiac conditions. The study population was divided into Suture group (n=483, 48.1%), and Ring group (n=522, 51.9%). Data variation between and within the groups was analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Radit analysis. Results: At two-year follow-up, in the Suture group, none/trace TR subjects were 63.9%, and 1.4% had severe TR; In the Ring group were: 63.9% none/trace, and 0.6% severe. Both groups’ two-year follow-up TR status was significantly different with preoperative TR status (p<0.05). At two-year follow-up, Suture group had 63.9% none/trace and 1.4% severe; and Ring group had 63.9% none/trace and 0.6% severe TR and there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: Both annuloplasty techniques have good short-term outcomes. However, suture annuloplasty deteriorates faster than ring annuloplasty, making the latter to be the ideal technique for TV repair.

Durability of suture versus ring tricuspid annuloplasty: Looking at very long term (18 years)

Background Several papers already reported better outcomes of tricuspid valve repair with ring annuloplasty compared to suture techniques. However, the follow-up is usually limited to 10 years. With this study, we aim to analyze the results of tricuspid valve repair according to the technique employed when the follow-up is extended to more than 15 years. Materials and methods A retrospective review of our institutional database was carried on to find all patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair between January 1998 and December 2004. Kaplan–Meier method was employed to estimate survival and log-rank test was used to make intergroup comparison. Cox regression was employed to identify risk factor for mortality. Cumulative incidence function using death as competitive outcome was used to estimate cardiac death. To describe the time course of tricuspid regurgitation, a longitudinal analysis using generalized estimating equations with random intercept for correlated data was performed. Results One hundred forty-six patients were identified: 89 in the suture group and 57 in the ring group. No difference in term of long-term survival and cardiac death was evident between the two groups. A significant higher rate of tricuspid regurgitation ≥2+ and ≥3+ recurrence was evident in the suture group during the whole follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusion Our results corroborate the better results of tricuspid valve repair by means of ring implantation compared to suture techniques also when the follow-up is extended up to 18 years. Ring annuloplasty should be considered the first option for tricuspid valve repair due to a better durability.