scholarly journals Clinical Experience of HeartMate II to HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device Exchange: A Multicenter Experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 1178-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Agarwal ◽  
Andreas Kyvernitakis ◽  
Behzad Soleimani ◽  
Carmelo A. Milano ◽  
Robert Patrick Davis ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian Urban ◽  
John Um ◽  
Michael Moulton ◽  
Douglas Stoller ◽  
Ronald Zolty ◽  
...  

In selected patients with left ventricular assist device–associated infection or malfunction, pump exchange may become necessary after conservative treatment options fail and heart transplantation is not readily available. We examined the survival and complication rate in patients (⩾19 years of age) who underwent HeartMate II to HeartMate II exchange at our institution from 1 January 2010 to 28 February 2018. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared for patients who underwent exchange for pump thrombosis (14 patients), breach of driveline integrity (5 patients), and device-associated infection (2 patients). There were no differences in 30-day mortality (p = 0.58), need for temporary renal replacement therapy (p = 0.58), right ventricular mechanical support (p = 0.11), and postoperative stroke (p = 0.80) among groups. Survival at 1 year was 90% ± 7% for the whole cohort and 85% ± 10% for those who underwent exchange for pump thrombosis. In patients exchanged for device thrombosis, freedom from re-thrombosis and survival free from pump re-thrombosis at 1 year were 49% ± 16% and 42% ± 15%, respectively. No association of demographic and clinical variables with the risk of recurrent pump thrombosis after the first exchange was identified. Survival after left ventricular assist device exchange compares well with published results after primary left ventricular assist device implantation. However, recurrence of thrombosis was common among patients who required a left ventricular assist device exchange due to pump thrombosis. In this sub-group, consideration should be given to alternative strategies to improve the outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (S15) ◽  
pp. S1728-S1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmin S. Hanke ◽  
Günes Dogan ◽  
Leonard Wert ◽  
Marcel Ricklefs ◽  
Jan Heimeshoff ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Takeda ◽  
Hiroo Takayama ◽  
Joseph Sanchez ◽  
Marisa Cevasco ◽  
Melana Yuzefpolskaya ◽  
...  

Abstract The HeartMate II (HMII) left ventricular assist device can be exchanged to HeartMate 3 (HM3) to reduce the risk of device thrombosis and stroke. However, data of this procedure are still limited. We reviewed early and mid-term outcomes of 9 patients who received a HMII to HM3 exchange at our institution. The median age of the cohort was 58 years [interquartile range (IQR) 53–61], and 7 (78%) patients were men. The median duration of HMII support was 608 days (IQR 493–1116). Indications for device exchange include device thrombosis (n = 8.89%) and driveline injury (n = 1.11%). Procedures were performed through a lateral thoracotomy in all patients. The median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 117 min (IQR 97–133). In-hospital mortality was 0%. One patient required repositioning of the HM3 pump through full sternotomy due to inflow malposition. During 486 days (IQR 235–712) of follow-up, 3 patients (33%) developed late HMII pump pocket infection after discharge. Five patients had a successful heart transplant and 1 patient died due to unknown reason. HMII to HM3 exchange can be performed via lateral thoracotomy. However, there is a risk of inflow malposition and previous pump pocket infection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document