The trend of surface ozone in Taipei, Taiwan, and its causes: Implications for ozone control strategies

2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (21) ◽  
pp. 3898-3908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles C.-K. Chou ◽  
Shaw C. Liu ◽  
Chuan-Yao Lin ◽  
Chein-Jung Shiu ◽  
Ken-Hui Chang
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 503-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Che Hsu ◽  
Jay M. Rosenberger ◽  
Neelesh V. Sule ◽  
Melanie L. Sattler ◽  
Victoria C. P. Chen

Author(s):  
S. Trivikrama Rao ◽  
Christian Hogrefe ◽  
Gopal Sistla ◽  
Shiang-Yuh Wu ◽  
Winston Hao ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 2011-2025 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Sistla ◽  
N. Zhou ◽  
W. Hao ◽  
J.-Y. Ku ◽  
S.T. Rao ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Sun ◽  
Likun Xue ◽  
Yuhang Wang ◽  
Longlei Li ◽  
Jintai Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract. Recent studies have shown that surface ozone (O3) concentrations over Central Eastern China (CEC) have increased significantly during the past decade. We quantified the effects of changes in meteorological conditions and O3 precursor emissions on surface O3 levels over CEC between July 2003 and July 2015 using the GEOS-Chem model. The simulated monthly mean maximum daily 8-h average O3 concentration (MDA8 O3) in July increased by approximately 13.6 %, from 65.5 ± 7.9 ppbv (2003) to 74.4 ± 8.7 ppbv (2015), comparable to the observed results. The change in meteorology led to an increase of MDA8 O3 of 5.8 ± 3.9 ppbv over the central part of CEC, in contrast to a decrease of about −0.8 ± 3.5 ppbv over the eastern part of the region. In comparison, the MDA8 O3 over the central and eastern parts of CEC increased by 3.5 ± 1.4 ppbv and 5.6 ± 1.8 ppbv due to the increased emissions. The increase in regional averaged O3 resulting from the emission increase (4.0 ± 1.9 ppbv) was higher than that caused by meteorological changes (3.1 ± 4.9 ppbv) relative to the 2003 standard simulation, while the regions with larger O3 increases showed a higher sensitivity to meteorological conditions than to emission changes. Sensitivity tests indicate that increased levels of anthropogenic non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) dominate the O3 increase over the eastern part of CEC, and anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NOx) mainly increase O3 concentrations over the central and western parts, while decrease O3 in a few urban areas in the eastern part. Process analysis showed that net photochemical production and meteorological conditions (transport in particular) are two important factors that influence O3 levels over the CEC. The results of this study suggest a need to further assess the effectiveness of control strategies for O3 pollution in the context of regional meteorology, transboundary transport, and anthropogenic emission changes.


JAPCA ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 895-900
Author(s):  
George T. Wolff ◽  
Kenneth L. Schere ◽  
John L. Hanisch ◽  
Richard Cahaly

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
pp. 6983-6998 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Koumoutsaris ◽  
I. Bey

Abstract. Quantifying trends in surface ozone concentrations is critical for assessing pollution control strategies. Here we use observations and results from a global chemical transport model to examine the trends (1991–2005) in daily maximum 8-h average concentrations in summertime surface ozone at rural sites in Europe and the United States (US). We find a decrease in observed ozone concentrations at the high end of the probability distribution at many of the sites in both regions. The model attributes these trends to a decrease in local anthropogenic ozone precursors, although simulated decreasing trends are overestimated in comparison with observed ones. The low end of observed distribution show small upward trends over Europe and the western US and downward trends in Eastern US. The model cannot reproduce these observed trends, especially over Europe and the western US. In particular, simulated changes between the low and high end of the distributions in these two regions are not significant. Sensitivity simulations indicate that emissions from far away source regions do not affect significantly summer ozone trends at both ends of the distribution in both Europe and US. Possible reasons for discrepancies between observed and simulated trends are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document