Early differentiation of memory retrieval processes for newly learned voices and phonemes as indexed by the MMN

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 ◽  
pp. 104981
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Di Dona ◽  
Michele Scaltritti ◽  
Simone Sulpizio
Keyword(s):  
Memory Retrieval ◽  
Early Differentiation ◽  
Retrieval Processes

scholarly journals Comprehending anaphoric presuppositions involves memory retrieval too

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry Yong Chen ◽  
E. Matthew Husband
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Diffusion Model ◽  
Memory Retrieval ◽  
Direct Access ◽  
Memory Representation ◽  
Drift Diffusion Model ◽  
Drift Diffusion ◽  
Retrieval Processes ◽  
Retrieval Mechanism ◽  
Presupposition Triggers

We investigate the memory retrieval mechanism that underlies the real-time comprehension of anaphoric presupposition triggers. Using the Drift Diffusion Model, we offer a new experimental argument for the anaphoric view of presuppositions with evidence from the memory retrieval processes associated with the trigger too. We show that the memory representation of the antecedent content that satisfies the presupposition is retrieved via a direct access mechanism, suggesting that anaphoric triggers such as too share the same processing signature of many anaphoric expressions, such as pronouns and VP ellipses.

scholarly journals Dissociating memory retrieval processes using fMRI: Evidence that priming does not support recognition memory

NeuroImage ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 659 ◽  
Author(s):  
David I. Donaldson ◽  
Steven E. Petersen ◽  
Randy L. Buckner
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Memory Retrieval ◽  
Retrieval Processes

scholarly journals The ERP Old-New Effect: A Useful Indicator in Studying the Effects of Sleep on Memory Retrieval Processes

SLEEP ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1491-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melodee Mograss ◽  
Roger Godbout ◽  
F. Guillem
Keyword(s):  
Memory Retrieval ◽  
Retrieval Processes

On the role of discourse-level information in second-language sentence processing

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 698-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELSI KAISER
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Sentence Processing ◽  
Memory Retrieval ◽  
L2 Processing ◽  
Retrieval Processes ◽  
Shallow Structure Hypothesis ◽  
Level Information ◽  
L1 And L2 ◽  
Shallow Structure

Based on a detailed review of existing studies of high-proficiency second-language (L2) learners who acquired the L2 in adolescence/adulthood, Cunnings (Cunnings, 2016) argues that Sorace's (2011) Interface Hypothesis (IH) and Clahsen and Felser's (2006) Shallow Structure Hypothesis (SSH) do not explain the existing data as well as his memory-based approach which posits that memory-retrieval processes in the L1 and L2 do not pattern alike. Cunnings proposes that L1 and L2 processing differ in terms of comprehenders’ ability to retrieve from memory information constructed during sentence processing. He concludes that L2 processing is more susceptible to interference effects during retrieval, and, most relevantly for this commentary, that discourse-based cues to memory retrieval are more heavily weighted in L2 than L1 processing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document