Dissociated roles of the anterior cingulate cortex in reward and conflict processing as revealed by the feedback error-related negativity and N200

2011 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis E. Baker ◽  
Clay B. Holroyd
2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 796-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Fan ◽  
P. R. Hof ◽  
K. G. Guise ◽  
J. A. Fossella ◽  
M. I. Posner

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1637-1655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borís Burle ◽  
Clémence Roger ◽  
Sonia Allain ◽  
Franck Vidal ◽  
Thierry Hasbroucq

Our ability to detect and correct errors is essential for our adaptive behavior. The conflict-loop theory states that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays a key role in detecting the need to increase control through conflict monitoring. Such monitoring is assumed to manifest itself in an electroencephalographic (EEG) component, the “error negativity” (Ne or “error-related negativity” [ERN]). We have directly tested the hypothesis that the ACC monitors conflict through simulation and experimental studies. Both the simulated and EEG traces were sorted, on a trial-by-trial basis, as a function of the degree of conflict, measured as the temporal overlap between incorrect and correct response activations. The simulations clearly show that conflict increases as temporal overlap between response activation increases, whereas the experimental results demonstrate that the amplitude of the Ne decreases as temporal overlap increases, suggesting that the ACC does not monitor conflict. At a functional level, the results show that the duration of the Ne depends on the time needed to correct (partial) errors, revealing an “on-line” modulation of control on a very short time scale.


2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Ullsperger ◽  
D. Yves von Cramon

The basal ganglia have been suggested to play a key role in performance monitoring and resulting behavioral adjustments. It is assumed that the integration of prefrontal and motor cortico—striato—thalamo—cortical circuits provides contextual information to the motor anterior cingulate cortex regions to enable their function in performance monitoring. So far, direct evidence is missing, however. We addressed the involvement of frontostriatal circuits in performance monitoring by collecting event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and behavioral data in nine patients with focal basal ganglia lesions and seven patients with lateral prefrontal cortex lesions while they performed a flanker task. In both patient groups, the amplitude of the error-related negativity was reduced, diminishing the difference to the ERPs on correct responses. Despite these electrophysiological abnormalities, most of the patients were able to correct errors. Only in lateral prefrontal cortex patients whose lesions extended into the frontal white matter, disrupting the connections to the motor anterior cingulate cortex and the striatum, were error corrections severely impaired. In sum, the fronto—striato—thalamo—cortical circuits seem necessary for the generation of error-related negativity, even when brain plasticity has resulted in behavioral compensation of the damage. Thus, error-related ERPs in patients provide a sensitive measure of the integrity of the performance monitoring network.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislas Dehaene

The error-related negativity (ERN) is a negative waveform that arises over the front of the scalp immediately after a participant makes a detectable error. The goal of this short article is to describe my serendipitous encounter with this brain signal in 1993–1994 and to briefly review the operation of the underlying error-monitoring system. Recent work suggests that the ERN reflects an internal comparison, by the anterior cingulate cortex, of two signals: an unconscious representation of the ongoing action and a conscious representation of the intended one.


2003 ◽  
Vol 64 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang H.R. Miltner ◽  
Ulrike Lemke ◽  
Thomas Weiss ◽  
Clay Holroyd ◽  
Marten K. Scheffers ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chobok Kim ◽  
James K. Kroger ◽  
Jeounghoon Kim

NeuroImage ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1599-1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Pastötter ◽  
Simon Hanslmayr ◽  
Karl-Heinz T. Bäuml

NeuroImage ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1150-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian C. Ruff ◽  
Todd S. Woodward ◽  
Kristin R. Laurens ◽  
Peter F. Liddle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document